Tactical Paradigm Shifts & The South Coast Blueprint: Auditing Br...

🎙️ Tifo Football Podcast •September 22, 2026 •⏱️ 1h 22m

Brighton demolish Arsenal, Man City are top & Spurs lose again

1. Executive Overview: Core Theses & Key Revelations

The recent iteration of the Tifo Football Podcast provided an extraordinary window into a seismic tactical turning point in the Premier League season. Brighton & Hove Albion's resounding 3-0 dismantling of Mikel Arteta’s Arsenal at the Amex Stadium was not merely a shock scoreline; it served as a masterclass in high-intensity tactical disruption, exposing deep-seated vulnerabilities in the build-up mechanics of the title contenders. The conversation between analytical voices Ruben Pinder, Kair Alex Barker, and Seb Stafford-Bloor illuminated how Fabian Hurzeler’s tactical gamble has fundamentally challenged the positional play dominance long enjoyed by elite sides.

At the center of this breakdown lies Mikel Arteta’s remarkable post-match admission. Rather than deflecting blame toward refereeing decisions or physical fatigue, Arteta conceded that his side failed to respect basic tactical principles required to escape full-pitch man-to-man pressure. This explicit recognition highlights a growing tactical dilemma in top-flight football: when an opponent willingly commits to an aggressive, synchronized, 90-minute man-oriented press, rigid positional systems can rapidly lock up, forcing low-probability long balls and systemic panic.

Beyond the immediate aftermath of the South Coast clash, the podcast episode unpicked broader structural shifts reshaping the modern game. From the emergence of non-autocratic, collaborative head coaches like Hurzeler to the wild defensive transitions seen in Manchester City’s 5-3 goalfest against Sunderland—punctuated by Brian Brobbey’s hat-trick—the discussion provided a comprehensive audit of top-flight tactical trends. Furthermore, Tottenham Hotspur’s descent to the foot of the table prior to the international break and the promising development curve of young defenders like Luca Vuskovic demonstrate that structural clarity and managerial adaptability are rapidly replacing traditional reputation as the primary currencies of competitive success.

Analytical Focus	Key Tactical Finding	Broader Strategic Impact
Brighton vs. Arsenal	Relentless 90-minute man-to-man pressing collapsed Arsenal’s build-up mechanics.	Provides a blueprint for mid-block and high-pressing opponents to rattle positional play teams.
Managerial Governance	Fabian Hurzeler exemplifies the modern, collaborative head coach who operates within club structures.	Accelerates the decline of autocratic "manager-as-king" models in top-tier European clubs.
City vs. Sunderland	Manchester City winning 5-3 despite Brian Brobbey exposing high-line rest defense vulnerabilities.	Highlights the trade-off between overwhelming positional attack and transition vulnerability.
Spurs Bottom Status	Tottenham entering the international break at the bottom of the table despite individual talent.	Emphasizes the severity of systemic misalignment and defensive instability under pressure.

2. Context & Background: The Landscape Leading to This Conversation

To understand the significance of Brighton's 3-0 triumph and the subsequent analytical debate, one must examine the landscape preceding the fixture. Arsenal entered the match on the back of four consecutive victories, boasting the league’s most stingy defensive record and an established reputation for territorial dominance. Under Mikel Arteta, the Gunners had perfected a highly controlled, structure-first approach designed to minimize transition chaos, pin opponents deep within their own halves, and methodically generate high-probability scoring opportunities.

Conversely, Brighton & Hove Albion were navigating a period of dynamic transition. Following substantial summer squad turnover and the arrival of 31-year-old Fabian Hurzeler, questions lingered over how quickly the Seagulls could forge tactical cohesion. Yet, entering the fixture, Brighton sat third in the Premier League table as the top scorers in the division with 16 goals across five games. Their rapid assimilation of Hurzeler’s demands demonstrated that squad refresh need not impede immediate tactical execution when backed by robust data-driven recruitment and clear operational role clarity.

The tactical backdrop of elite football has increasingly become a war between positional structure and high-tempo physical disruption. Over recent seasons, premier tactical architects focused on controlling space via zonal rest defenses and patient build-up play from the back. However, a counter-wave of aggressive, man-oriented pressing schemes—pioneered in Continental Europe and refined by modern coaches—has begun to puncture this control. Hurzeler’s game plan represented the purest realization of this counter-trend: a refusal to concede time on the ball to Arsenal's deep build-up operators, turning every short pass into a high-risk contest.

This episode of the Tifo Football Podcast acts as a vital historical record of this transition. By bringing together Kair Alex Barker's tactical breakdown, Ruben Pinder's empirical observations, and Seb Stafford-Bloor's deep expertise in European coaching paradigms, the conversation dissected not only a single match result, but the structural tremors echoing throughout the entire English top flight.

3. Deep-Dive Thematic Breakdown

3.1 Anatomizing Hurzeler’s Man-to-Man Trap: How Brighton Neutralized Arsenal’s Build-up Mechanics

Brighton’s tactical execution was built on an uncompromising commitment to full-pitch man-to-man engagement. Rather than dropping into a conservative mid-block and allowing Arsenal’s center-backs to orchestrate play, Hurzeler instructed his forward line and attacking midfielders to lock onto Arsenal’s primary passing outlets. Every pass from goalkeeper David Raya to his central defenders or inverted fullbacks was met with an immediate, explosive pressing trigger.

The consequences of this scheme were visible within the opening five minutes of the contest. As Ruben Pinder noted during the discussion, Raya was forced under immediate pressure into attempting a rushed, semi-long pass toward the touchline that sailed directly out of play. This early mistake was not an isolated technical blunder; it was the intended outcome of Brighton’s spatial denial. By suffocating the short passing angles that Arsenal traditionally rely upon to establish rhythm, Brighton induced immediate psychological and tactical disorientation.

Arteta’s post-match comments acknowledged that Arsenal failed to execute any of the essential principles designed to bypass man-to-man pressing schemes. In ideal scenarios, facing a man-oriented press requires rapid third-man combinations, dynamic positional rotations, and decisive 1v1 dribbling to break the opponent’s chain of coverage. Arsenal displayed none of these attributes. Instead, their outfield players remained static, failing to generate vertical movement or blind-side runs. Consequently, Arsenal were repeatedly pinned into their own defensive third, unable to establish possession in the final third or relieve pressure on their defensive line.

Furthermore, Brighton's pressing scheme relied heavily on shadow-marking techniques. When a Brighton midfielder jumped forward to press an Arsenal pivot player, their body orientation was deliberately set to cover the secondary passing lane behind them. This forced Raya and Gabriel to delay their decision-making by fractions of a second—a delay that allowed Brighton's wide players to close down the wingbacks before any progressive pass could land cleanly. The resulting spatial compression left Arsenal with zero clean exit routes.

3.2 The Midfield Antidote and Structural Disruption

Central to Brighton’s spatial suppression was their midfield configuration and physical dominance in central zones. As Kair Alex Barker highlighted during the episode, opponents facing Arsenal have struggled to find an antidote to their structured central progression. Brighton provided that antidote through synchronized jumping presses from central midfield, effectively smothering Arsenal’s double-pivot before they could turn upfield.

The battle for second balls proved decisive. By pairing aggressive man-marking with compact defensive distances, Brighton ensured that even when Arsenal attempted to bypass the press with direct aerial passes, Brighton’s backline and midfield screens were positioned to win the second-ball duels. This dynamic prevented Arsenal from securing second-phase possession, locking them into a continuous cycle of defensive recovery.

In addition, Barker drew parallels between Brighton's central smothering and broader Premier League midfield trends, such as Newcastle United's use of Bruno Guimaraes to anchor physical duel domination. When a team introduces an assertive, physically dominant presence into the central corridor, it disrupts the tempo of possession-oriented teams that rely on uncontested turn-and-play sequences. Arsenal's inability to establish physical superiority or execute rapid wall-passes in the central third left them completely unmoored from their tactical baseline.

Phase of Play	Arsenal Standard Principle	Brighton Counter-Tactics	Tactical Outcome
Goal Kick / First Line Build-up	Inverted fullbacks creating 3-2 structure; short passes from Raya.	Full-pitch man-to-man locking onto all short options; shadow coverage on pivots.	Rushed long balls, forced turnovers, ball kicked out of bounds.
Central Progression	Third-man combinations through central midfield pockets.	Aggressive jumping presses by central midfielders; physical duel enforcement.	Inability to turn upfield; frequent loss of central possession.
Second-Ball Recovery	High rest defense structure to reclaim cleared balls instantly.	Compact vertical lines winning aerial duels and second-phase drops.	Brighton sustained continuous attacking momentum and wave pressing.
Wide Overloads	Wingers isolation 1v1 supported by overlapping fullbacks.	Full-back jump pressing backed by defensive cover from wide attackers.	Arsenal wingers completely isolated with no forward passing angles.

3.3 Modern Managerial Governance: Hurzeler’s Collaborative Model vs Traditional Autocracy

Beyond on-pitch tactics, the panel engaged in a profound exploration of managerial philosophy, spearheaded by Seb Stafford-Bloor’s insights into Fabian Hurzeler’s operational style. Stafford-Bloor observed that Hurzeler exemplifies the modern head coach who understands that he is not a "king within a football club." This stands in sharp contrast to traditional dictatorial managers who seek to bend an entire institution around their individual personality and ego.

In modern elite football, the era of the omnipotent manager managing everything from academy scouting to contract negotiations is rapidly receding. Modern success requires seamless integration between the head coach, data analytics departments, technical directors, and global recruitment networks. Hurzeler’s success at Brighton stems directly from his willingness to work within a highly sophisticated club structure, adapting his tactical concepts to the profiles delivered by the recruitment team rather than demanding total autocratic control.

Furthermore, this collaborative mindset extends to public messaging and media interactions. Rather than resorting to histrionic press conference mind games or alienating public critiques of his squad, Hurzeler utilizes calculated, measured communication. This professional pragmatism fosters an environment where players execute high-risk, high-intensity tactical instructions without fear of public scapegoating, reinforcing squad cohesion during demanding 90-minute pressing performances.

Stafford-Bloor noted that coaches who attempt to muscle their clubs around their personal aura often create single points of failure. When results turn sour, the entire organizational infrastructure buckles under the weight of managerial friction. In contrast, Hurzeler's approach ensures that tactical success is embedded into the systemic architecture of Brighton & Hove Albion, making the team resilient to individual player departures or fixture congestion.

3.4 Defensive Fragility in Chaotic Transitions: Manchester City 5-3 Sunderland & The Brobbey Anomaly

The podcast panel also turned their attention to an extraordinary eight-goal thriller between Manchester City and Sunderland. Despite securing a 5-3 victory to maintain a 100% winning record at the top of the Premier League table, Pep Guardiola’s side demonstrated surprising defensive vulnerability when exposed to direct vertical transitions.

Sunderland striker Brian Brobbey produced a landmark performance, netting a hat-trick directly through the heart of Manchester City’s defensive structure. Brobbey’s success exposed the inherent risks of City’s ultra-high defensive line when counter-pressing mechanisms fail to immediately smother the outlet pass. By utilizing his explosive physical strength and direct running in behind, Brobbey repeatedly exploited the space between City’s center-backs and goalkeeper.

This high-scoring anomaly illustrates the ongoing tactical tension across elite football. While Manchester City possess unrivaled offensive fire-power capable of outscoring opponents even on off-days, their structural rest defense remains susceptible when opponents bypass their initial Gegenpressing wave. The discussion highlighted that even the division's standard-bearers are navigating delicate trade-offs between overwhelming territorial domination and transition stability.

The panel dissected how Sunderland's vertical directness bypassed City's mid-block trap. Rather than attempting short passing combinations through central zones where City's rest defense is most compact, Sunderland triggered long, measured passes into the channels immediately upon winning possession. Brobbey's physical capacity to hold off defenders and turn instantly converted low-probability clearances into high-threat counter-attacks, proving that City's high line can be compromised by elite physical profiles.

3.5 Systemic Crisis and Talent Calibration: Spurs at the Table Foot and Luca Vuskovic’s Trajectory

At the opposite end of the spectrum, Tottenham Hotspur entered the international break anchored to the bottom of the Premier League table—a dramatic predicament that generated substantial debate among the hosts. The panel highlighted the stark psychological difference between being "at the Premier League's bottom" versus merely experiencing a temporary dip in form. For Spurs, systemic defensive flaws and an inability to protect leads have created a compounding crisis of confidence.

Amid this bleak team landscape, individual player development remains a vital narrative arc. The panel evaluated the rapid growth of young defender Luca Vuskovic, currently continuing his development on loan. Seb Stafford-Bloor admitted delight in being proven wrong regarding Vuskovic’s projection. While initial evaluations raised red flags concerning Vuskovic’s acceleration, lateral mobility, and body control in tight spaces, his recent performances have showcased significant technical refinement, composure under pressure, and improved spatial awareness.

Vuskovic's trajectory serves as a case study in modern player development. Athletic deficiencies identified early in a prospect's development can be mitigated through targeted physical conditioning and intelligent positioning. For clubs operating at the highest level, identifying and correcting these nuanced tactical and biomechanical markers is essential for building sustainable long-term squad value.

Stafford-Bloor pointed out that Vuskovic's improved body orientation when turning to face direct counter-attacks has dramatically reduced his vulnerability to quick-footed attackers. By adjusting his initial defensive stance and utilizing proactive footwork, Vuskovic has transformed from a raw physical talent into a composure-driven central defender capable of handling high-tempo European football.

4. Speaker Perspectives & Analytical Contrast

The dialogue between the three contributors provided a rich, multi-layered breakdown of the weekend's events, with each analyst bringing a distinct perspective to the table:

Kair Alex Barker (Macro-Tactical Analyst): Barker focused heavily on structural blueprints, pressing mechanisms, and tactical standards. He was unsparing in his critique of Arsenal, pointing out that their performance fell well below the threshold required of genuine title contenders. Barker emphasized that Brighton’s game plan was not a lucky anomaly but a repeatable blueprint that coaches across the league will scrutinize and adapt.
Ruben Pinder (Pitch-Side Empirical Observer): Pinder provided key match-context observations, zeroing in on immediate physical indicators of tactical breakdown. His highlighting of David Raya’s early out-of-bounds clearance captured the exact moment Arsenal’s composure eroded, illustrating how tactical pressure translates into empirical technical error on the pitch.
Seb Stafford-Bloor (Cultural & European Football Correspondent): Stafford-Bloor provided essential institutional context, linking Hurzeler’s success to broader European coaching trends. His commentary on non-autocratic leadership and his nuanced tracking of Luca Vuskovic’s defensive development added analytical depth, contextualizing on-pitch results within long-term organizational strategy.

Speaker	Primary Lens	Core Thesis / Key Assertion	Analytical Highlight
Kair Alex Barker	Tactical Structures & Pressing Schemes	Brighton established a clear blueprint to unravel Arsenal's build-up; Arsenal's standards fell surprisingly short.	Emphasized that Hurzeler's press required rare bravery and coordination that exposed Arteta's rigid build-up.
Ruben Pinder	On-Pitch Execution & Match Tempo	Brighton's relentless intensity took Arsenal by surprise within the opening five minutes of play.	Identified Raya's rushed kicking into touch as the early catalyst of Arsenal's loss of composure.
Seb Stafford-Bloor	Managerial Culture & Talent Evaluation	Modern head coaches must act as collaborative managers within club frameworks rather than dictatorial kings.	Praised Hurzeler's governance model and admitted delight at being proven wrong by Luca Vuskovic's growth.

5. Strategic & Industry Implications

The tactical lessons emerging from Brighton’s victory over Arsenal extend far beyond a single three-point drop. For the Premier League at large, this match marks a clear point of inflection. Opposition managers facing Arsenal in upcoming fixtures will undoubtedly study Hurzeler’s man-to-man pressing mechanics, seeking to replicate the spatial denial that crippled the Gunners' build-up play. Arsenal can no longer rely on standard positional rotations; they must develop dynamic counter-measures, such as direct vertical targets or fluid positional interchanges, to break aggressive man-marking schemes.

From an industry-wide squad construction perspective, press-resistance has solidified its status as the most vital attribute for deep build-up players. Central defenders and deep-lying midfielders who lack the physical acceleration, press-resistant body control, or 1v1 dribbling skills to escape tight man-marking represent structural liabilities against top-tier pressing sides. Recruitment departments across Europe are increasingly prioritizing press-resistance metrics when evaluating target profiles.

Furthermore, the physical sustainability of high-intensity wave pressing is pushing sports science and squad depth to new frontiers. Brighton's ability to maintain man-to-man intensity for 90 minutes requires meticulous workload management, highly specific physical conditioning, and strategic squad rotation. Clubs attempting to replicate Hurzeler's blueprint without the necessary physical infrastructure risk high injury rates and late-game physical collapses.

Finally, the operational success of Fabian Hurzeler reinforces the broader industry trend toward collaborative managerial models. European football clubs are increasingly steering clear of autocratic managers who demand absolute authority over transfers and club operations. Instead, executive leadership teams favor tactically articulate, system-aligned head coaches who thrive within data-driven, multi-departmental structures. Hurzeler’s rapid impact at Brighton provides a compelling template for how modern football clubs can maintain high competitive standards despite significant player turnover.

6. Looking Ahead: Unresolved Questions & Next Milestones

As the Premier League pauses for the international break, several critical questions remain for analysts and club executives to monitor over the coming months:

Arsenal's Tactical Adaptation: How quickly can Mikel Arteta refine Arsenal's build-up mechanics to counter full-pitch man-to-man pressing? Will we see the introduction of more direct passing patterns or altered midfield structures to bypass high pressing traps?
Brighton's Physical Sustainability: Can Brighton maintain the extreme physical output required to execute Hurzeler's 90-minute man-oriented press across a grueling multi-front campaign without suffering squad fatigue or injuries?
Manchester City's Defensive Equilibrium: Will Pep Guardiola adjust City's rest defense structure to protect against direct vertical threats like Brian Brobbey, or will City rely strictly on their unmatched attacking firepower to outscore opponents?
Tottenham's Crisis Management: What structural changes must occur at Spurs to arrest their table-bottom tailspin, and can young talents like Luca Vuskovic provide long-term defensive stability upon their return?
The Spread of the Hurzeler Blueprint: Will other mid-table coaches attempt full-pitch man-marking against top-tier positional sides, accelerating a league-wide shift toward high-chaos, physical-duel matches?

The tactical battle lines for the remainder of the Premier League season have been clearly drawn. The clash between rigid positional possession and aggressive, man-marking disruption will continue to define the tactical evolution of top-flight football. As coaches up and down the country analyze Brighton's masterclass, the ability to adapt, innovate, and execute under pressure will decide who claims ultimate supremacy at the top of the table.

💬 Key Quotes & Speaker Breakdown

Arsenal tactical failure

"We didn't respect any principle of play that you have to get out of those man-to-man situations, which put us always on the back foot."

— Mikel Arteta

Premier League tactical trends

"I think there's kind of a little bit of a blueprint that Fabian Hurtzler has stumbled across. And then with the Bruno Guimaraes coming into midfield as well, Arsenal didn't really have an antidote to it."

— Kair

Brighton vs Arsenal analysis

"Arsenal turned up in good form, probably expecting to win with some comfort, but Brighton were in better form. They came into this game with a clear game plan as to how they wanted to topple Arsenal, which was press and press and press."

— Kair

Brighton tactical gamble

"Brighton seemingly just kind of did it relentlessly, constantly. And that took Arsenal by surprise. You could see in the first five minutes of the game, Raya has gone, he's tried to go semi-long to a fullback, but it was gone out of play."

— Ruben Pinder

Arsenal title race

"Arsenal standards are a little bit lower than I expected them to be here. I don't think you're going to have coaches up and down the country thinking, right, this is how we're going to do it. It's going to be how do you compete with Arsenal?"

— Kair

Fabian Hurtzler management style

"He's a modern coach in the sense that he understands that a head coach is not a king within a football club. I still think there are coaches around who want to muscle their clubs around their personality."

— Seb Stafford-Bloor

Luca Vuskovich performance

"There were times last season where his lack of acceleration and his body control were found wanting and they were exposed. He seems to have settled really, really well. I'm delighted to be proved wrong."

— Seb Stafford-Bloor

📜 View Full Episode Verbatim Transcript 67,588 characters

Hello and welcome to the TFO football podcast brought to you by EA Sports FC27. Today I'm joined by Ruben Pinder. I'm in a different chair. Yeah, you had a feel. Yeah, weird. Do you like it? Yeah. Okay. It's nice because I don't have to do this when I answer your questions all the time. Right. I'll do it when I'm sorry over there. Weird but nice. Yeah. It's okay. He's felt that before. Ruben, it looked like you were lifting your leg up to let a little fart out. I think out of the side. That's kind of the posture, I would say. Well, what a grotesque start now. A lot of people complained that we talked mainly about poo in ring for analysis on Saturday's episode, but we've already there. We're already there with the poo particles, at least with farts. Now, speaking of farts, he's German football correspondent for the athletic. It's Seb, Stafford Law. Hey, Jada. Right, how's it going? It's going well. Plus Steve Hanky's here. I told you not to mute. That was meant to be a fart. That was meant to be a fart. That was meant to be a fart. You know, the sort of curious ones. You're like, that's the same noise that you make when you're used to. That's the same noise that you make when you're used to. I was looking at the seagull, but that was a fart. Good, that was a fart. Good, good. All right. Scotchy. Oh, okay. Something definitely got caught. And it was two people here making fart noises. We do not need that now. What did we talk about on today's show? Well, we start on the South Coast to discuss Brighton's fantastic victory over Arsenal. But inevitably, we end up talking about seagulls trying to deal potato-based next. That's right. We do talk about that. We also question what animal Arsenal would be if Brighton are indeed seagulls. We haven't really landed on an answer there, do you think? I think we do, but it's not very satisfactory. Yeah, okay. I thought my giraffe shout deserved more attention in this section. Sure. Yeah. I didn't. Did Brighton's tactical gamble pay off? And should other teams roll the dice like this against the gun as well? We discussed that too. We speak about Fabian Hurtzler's calculated comments in press conferences. I attempt some of these to rile Seb up. That's very exciting. We played a little game, don't we? Where you see right through the game to the vicious comment that I intended. Then we play the rondo. Very exciting rondo. Not very competitive. Worth saying that. Not at all competitive. But an exciting rondo nonetheless. After the rondo, we speak about the goalfest that was a man-city sunland. Brian Robbie scoring a hat trick through the city defence. Not enough to secure a point for the black cats. I'll have to pause there because I assume Steve was going to mute. Thank you for not mowing Steve. Now. Oh, God. Spurs into the international break at the Premier League's bottom. But were there any signs of hope for the fans of the Lily White's right? At the Premier League's bottom. It feels very different to saying at the bottom of the Premier League. That's me. And then we come to an end with I'm Clients Abyssin of Bundesliga. Is that right? Seb, can you read that for me in German? Yeah. I'm Clients Abyssin of Bundesliga. Yeah, you and Sir Clients Abyssin. What would you say? Because it's like kind of saying the same thing. So you just say I'm Byssin Bundesliga. I'm a bit of Bundesliga. I'm Byssin. You're either you're saying a small bit of Bundesliga. It's not really. It's a topology. Right. I'm Byssin of Bundesliga. I'm Byssin Bundesliga. I'm Byssin Bundesliga. They don't have a half in German. No, you can just use that. You just roll straight into it. I translate it directly a little morsel. Which I guess is where the repetition comes from. There you go. Yes, a little morsel. The morsels are never bit. A little little. Germans wouldn't be that floral with them. Anyway, on Thursday, I'm joined by Kair Alex Barker and Colin Miller. There's a ring for analysis out on Saturday, which is just already a really great one. It's very good. It's got Seb on that one. It's a very special guy. And there's no livestream on Sunday. Of course, because it's an international break. So don't look out for that. Well, there we go. I think that's everything Steve, isn't it? Yeah. Okay, enjoy the show. Well, where else to begin, of course? Then Brighton 3. Neil Arsenal. Good. That's me. The Premier League champions humbled on the South Coast. That's Brighton and Hoavian beat them infatically with uncharacteristic defensive errors. Defining Arsenal's overall performance. Now Brighton, enter the international break third in the Premier League and current top scorers with 16 goals and just five games. After the game, Micka Latetta asks, you look confused, Kair. I'm upset. You're all right. Yeah. Is your confused face the same as your upset face? I guess I found that out now. You look like this. You were going, I think I started off a furrowed brown. Yeah, a furrowed brown. A furrowed brown with despair. Yeah. That's okay. Well, Micka Latetta was similarly despairing here. He said after the game, he was, quote, extremely disappointed. But first of all, we have to congratulate Brighton for the victory. He said they deserve it. They were the better team. He continued, we didn't respect any principle of play that you have to get out of those man-to-man situations, which put us always on the back foot. So it was very difficult to control the game. That's what Micka Latetta said. And of course, for Arsenal, it's four wins from five games. They go into the international break second and three points behind 100% record. Manchester City, after their five three victory over Sunderland on Sunday, Kair. Bit of a surprise this one. Perhaps not the Brighton one, but the Brighton one as, quote, emphatically as they did. Yeah. What happened? Arsenal got pecked. Right. There you go. Yeah. Vicious pecking. It was vicious. They arrived on the South Coast with chips. Yeah. No one had informed them not to do that. Yeah. I saw a Seagull once taken an entire ice cream from someone's hand. Like with the cone as well. It was very impressive. You've got to beat like, so I grew up on the coast. Yeah. And you've got to be firm with Seagulls. In fact, I was on the South Coast on Friday. And I had some, well, they weren't chips. They were smashed potatoes, because that's just the kind of class of person. Wow. Delicious, salty smashed potatoes. And there was a baby seagull and a mother seagull hovering round. And I made sure they knew with my body language that they were to get fucked. Right. And all of my potatoes were absolutely fine. They were all for me to eat, and I ate them all. This does sound a bit like Michael Arthetta, sort of pretty much team talk. Right. Or the metaphors that he uses. I can see that being done. He loves body language. He does hiding chips in his players' pockets. Yes. Yes, yes. As they get off the bus and the seagulls come down and get them solving. Yeah. What happened on the game? Yeah, Arsenal turned up in good form, probably expecting to win with some comfort, but Brighton were in better form, I think, at the minute. They played really, really well. They played well against Man United just before. And they came into this game with a clear game plan as to how they wanted to topple Arsenal, which was press and press and press and press and press. And they did not stop for 90 minutes. And normally the difficulty with that strategy is A, you have to be really brave to do it, which Brighton were, and they did it really, really well. You have to be really coordinated to do it as well, which again they were, which is impressive from Herzog as well, given that they had quite a lot of turnover in the summer. They had a lot of players going out and quite a few coming in as well. So the way they've been able to establish those relationships so quickly is really impressive. And then also, when I say brave, you need to be coordinated. Yeah. They very much are like seagulls in that set. I know we were joking before, but come to think of it. Yeah, they peck, they're aggressive. I mean, they do act in groups as well. They coordinate. Sometimes you'll see one seagull distracting the prey while the other steals the chips of the prey. You know? Very impressive. And Arsenal, what are their chips stolen well and truly? If Arsenal were an animal. Yeah. What animal would they be? Good question. Obviously, at the moment, they'd be quite a big animal. Yeah, maybe one that is stupid enough to get pecked by some seagulls, I mean. That sounds like a human to be fair. Yeah. Are Arsenal a human? Arsenal be... Are Arsenal the human of the Premier League? I don't know. That doesn't sound good to me. I don't know. I don't know. Like a physical one. No. Except you haven't got any ideas of you. No, I feel like if I were to express them somehow, that would backfire. I'd say something bad. Right. The internet would dislike it and my weak will become a lot longer than it needs to be. I think they might be sort of like a rhinoceros, you know, in the sense that they're incredibly formidable and yet also sort of being hunted to extinction. Well, no, because the rhinoceros will show that bit, but don't they kind of need a seagull like powder to know to clean their backs. They have that symbiotic relationship. That's true. Doesn't really work here. No, that doesn't work. A hippo? No, because again, similarly, they have the friendly birds. What kind of animal do birds hate? Humans. Humans. Do you know what? I think I saw all the humans of the Premier League. Yeah. I didn't like to say it, but I think it might be true. When I was in America during the World Cup, I got a shot on by a bird for the first time in my life. An American bird. Yeah. What kind of bird was it? It's a dirty New York pigeon. A pigeon. Yeah. And I imagine that's how the Arsenal defenders felt during this game. Whereabouts on your body? Kind of shot. Shot. Shot. Shot. That's pretty lucky. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I got in, I was in Dublin and I was just coming out there at the Guinness factory I'd been for a tour there. That's good fun. It was great fun until I got pooed on by a seagull on my face. But it managed to hit my sunglasses, but just like go inside the sunglasses, the gap in between my eye and the sunglasses. So it could have been bleeding. You didn't do an ass. You're quite an excellent prone person. Yeah. I don't know all that well. If I was asked to describe you or lean on anecdotes like that and the sunglasses, the worst I've ever seen. It was. I really loved it could have been blinded. It could have been blinded. Yeah. I also got mildly sunburned again on holiday last week. No. I did. But it wasn't as bad this time. It was full. Yeah. I fell asleep on the beach again. Oh my god. I was falling asleep. Yeah. I feel sympathy. The second time I lose a bit of respect for you. Yeah. I looked at myself and I was like, I cannot believe you've done this again. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. I'm very disappointed in you. I'm disappointed in myself. Well, when my father put down his latest dog, he went to the park afterwards that they used to walk in. And he sat on a bench and cried. And then a seat, not a seagull, a pigeon, put on his head. And he said, that's the dog. And then he stopped crying and was happy. Sometimes, a seagull or any kind of bird pulling on your head. It's supposed to be good luck, isn't it? It can be a good thing. In the case of Arsenal, as Ruben just mentioned, also perhaps falling asleep on the beach. Yeah. Their game was riddled as Artheta mentioned with technical errors. Was it just a bad day, do you think? Or are they, in fact, terrible players, who haven't noticed? I don't think they're terrible players. I think there was a thing where Michel Artheta had filled the lineup games this game. And most people were to describe, apart from William Celeba, being out as Arsenal's first choice line up. The arrival of Bruno Gilmere is in the summer. Most people expect there's going to be a double pivot with him and Declan Rice. And Bruno Gilmere and Declan Rice is great when they're looking at the opposition goal, when they've got their back to play. They do have some, I think, weaknesses comparatively. Their technical level isn't as high, it's really good, but it's not as high as, I think other players are in the Arsenal squad. And so up until this game, Marzo Estgelli has been partnering Declan Rice in the midfield. And that's worked quite well for Arsenal, because they kind of offset each other's skills. And Marzo Estgelli reminds me a bit, I think some other people have said this already, but I've... Do you remember Moussa Dembele, the spurs one, or the as far as I'm concerned? I don't know how to say that. Just a little more. Yeah. And his ability sort of resists the press and his strength and his kind of bravery when it came to kind of baiting the press and then just jinking away from it. Louis Estgelli's got that in his locker. And Bruno Gilmere doesn't have that to the same extent, but I understand why Bruno had played, because he was only going to get 70. And he cost 70,000. And he cost 70,000. Louis Estgelli is an academy kid. And they bought him an XC. We're prepared to let Louis Scully go. Yes, best we don't talk about that bit. But I think there's an interesting thing to be had there, where Arsenal is quite rare that teams are that a braving against Arsenal. They tend to sit off. They tend to be a bit more passive, and they don't tend to do it as well in terms of the high press. Sure. So does anyone remember the last time Arsenal got beaten? It's been quite a while, I know, but does anyone remember that game? It wasn't Villa. It wasn't at all in any game last season. It was later than that. Wow, we're not counting the Champions League final. No, that doesn't go. Because that was a draw. Yeah, I remember they lost that quite badly. No, they didn't. They cut Final. It wasn't the League Cup final. Oh, they lost that one quite badly as well. That's why they always made a mistake. It was Bournemouth. Bournemouth. Another team who ran away with Alistair Scotscourt. Exactly, exactly. And that kind of team who got lots of legs get after you and force you to play with your back to the play. I think there's kind of a little bit of a blueprint that Fabian Hertz has stumbled across. And then with the Bruno Gilmourage coming into midfield as well, Arsenal didn't really have an antidote to it. And normally when Arsenal pressed that high, they try and go long to avoid it. But when they did that, Brighton had Luke of Escavich and Pascal Strauk, who were just winning the duel. So I don't know if it's a long-term issue for Arsenal, because I don't know how many of those kind of games they're going to face. But I wonder if teams will see that and think, right, we could be more brave against Arsenal. Let's go for it and go after them a bit more, but you have to be really, really good. It's just what Brighton is. On that midfield partnership, it just occurred to me that both of them are like excellent players. This is Gilmourage and Rice. Yeah, yeah. But both of them have also been moved from the deepest midfield role to a more advanced one. Rice, when he first joined, and there was this seemingly the plan to play Harvard, so there's one of the eights and Rice's six. And then that got reshuffled, hence does it be mending signing. And in Newcastle, Bruno Gilmourage got pushed to a more advanced role, and Tanali was the one tucking in as the six. And I guess that was more to make use of Gilmourage's, which is a funny word to say, attacking qualities, rather than defensive deficiencies. But if they are both kind of slightly more attack-minded box-to-box, like to carry the ball players, whether this will become a bit of a blueprint for how to nullify their early buildup. What's the, who's the distributor in that pairing? That's a fair question. Yeah, that's a fair question. If you have Zuvenmendi in there, sure, like Ruben just mentioned, Tanali at Newcastle, if you're working the ball out from... Who isn't really much of that either? Not really. He's quite lateral at times, but then if you're trying to play from deep and you're playing against a pressing side, who's comfortable receiving the ball with their back to the play, and then playing out? Marsler of Skelly. Exactly. That all Zuvenmendi, I think you'd want him in there. That's a tricky one. Has anyone started calling them Gima Rice yet? Got to feel so. Oh, have them. But they should have done. The first time they started together in the Prem. Yes. There you go. You've coined it. Gima Rice. Gima Rice. Gima Rice. Gima Rice. They're not quite good in a dark ball pivot. Or Rice Rice. Yeah, Rice Rice Bruno. Okay, well, we're going to pick up on a bunch of things that Kaya said, actually. First off, Ruben, let's come to you. Now, John, who's absent today, he's made a, he made his, did you notice, video this week, which incidentally publishes on the athletic social media channel. So if you want to go and watch it, you can do. But the thing he focused on was that actually came from this game. It was about Brighton's press that Kaya was just referring to. He called it a gamble. So I'm kind of curious, because Kaya has kind of set it up as a possibility that other teams could learn from this blueprint and perhaps Brighton having them in themselves. John thinks he's also a bit of a gamble, though. What does he mean? Well, as he said many times, every tactic involves a trade-off. Right. If you lean into doing one thing, it means you do less of a different thing. Yeah. Or you, you just move risk around, I suppose. So, you know, if you park the bus and play in a low block, then you risk not scoring any goals, but whatever. So the risk here, I guess, is that what John was explaining to us yesterday was that quite often, other teams will try to press quite aggressively when Arsenal are building from their goalkeeper. And then once Arsenal get through their first wave of pressure, the opposition will kind of accept and they'll kind of see control and be like, okay, fair enough, they got through that. Once they're unsettled, because a settled possession is the term he likes to use yet. And then they'll maybe drop off and form something of a mid block and wait for other opportunities to pounce. But Brighton seemingly just kind of did it relentlessly, constantly. And that took Arsenal by surprise. You could see, like, I think in the first five minutes of the game, Raya has gone, he's tried to go semi long to like a fallback, califuri or timber, but was gone out of play. He's done that two or three times in the first five, ten minutes. Yeah. And then you can sense the atmosphere kind of heats up and the Arsenal players start to not panic. Sure. But they are surprised at how much they're being pressed kind of in their own third or in the middle of the pitch, because they're not used to it. And like I say, it was sort of 3 p.m. kickoff, so I wasn't able to watch the game in a full 90. But from the highlights, he seemed like everything was just relentless pressing. And like the distances between the Brighton players were always so good. Nobody was ever doing it too far away from anybody else. So it was so effective in if the first guy doesn't get to the ball, then the guy receiving it will be under so much pressure. And what's more impressive about this is that Brighton is missing, like, as always at Brighton, key players leave. Well, but left. Router is injured. Metoma is injured. Or Router came back, but has been missing. But Labour left. But Labour left. They were playing the rested Yalkui, because he's only five foot seven. Yeah. Well, Vanhaka left. They rested him, because he's only five foot seven. Yeah. And they play Chema Andres. Six and three. That's a lot of fair reason to rest someone. When you play an Arsenal, you want the physicality. Sorry. When you said they rested, you mean they subbed him. No, no, no, no. They put him in a rotated him. Yeah, yeah, yeah. When you said rested him, I was like, they've rested him, because he's short, so he's tired. That's like a discriminatory action. That's not what I mean. He's five foot seven. He'll be too tired to play the next game. They've rested. They've rotated him. They've rotated him. They've rotated him. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And it works, because, you know, like I said, every time the ball went long, they got buscovich in the back. Yeah. And Arsenal. So the trade, the gamble here, though, the tradeoff is that, okay, so it's surprising, but if Arsenal managed to play through that continued pressure, then they're way more likely to score, right? Yeah. Because they're much more open. And it's a tiring thing to do. Yeah. Like teams will often press in kind of spurts of intensity. Yeah. And then they'll have 10 minutes of more passive play and then go really aggressive again, because to do that constantly is really, really difficult. Especially, Pascal Gross is just an absolute joke. My stroke, my stroke. It really pains me to pour all of this praise on Brighton, but like he's 35. He runs more than anybody else. But he's not even quick. Right. But he's played as a 10 at a 6 and a right back over the course of his two Brian Stinson. Sure. And he's just ridiculously calm and ruthless and two-footed. He kind of reminds me like, he's got an Adam Lalana-esque two-footedness about him. Yeah. And Chris' Croft turns in football as well. Yeah. It's quite slow, but it's very artistic. But he runs at like the same pace constantly. He's got one gear, but it's like just about quick enough. Yeah. And he struts around like a kind of like somebody has that hatred coming out. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, it's more praisey. He's like somebody playing years above their age group. Kind of like just like playing with a bunch of kids, like a dad and his kids. Innocence. He is playing years above the age group. Well, yeah, because he's a midfield partner. There's like 19. Yeah, yeah, yeah. If you look at... So Rubin made the point about sort of the physical challenge of playing this Brighton. If you turn it round and you're on the other side of the ball against him and you look at... Okay, so Pascal Gross and Kema Andres is a midfield pairing. By the way, I thought Kema Andres might have made a really good Arsenal player last summer. Right. You're one of the physicality and the technical ability. Yeah. That group can cut through you with that passing pretty easily. And so you're working hard to kind of get out of your own zone. But also when you don't have the ball, you're trying to shut gaps between your lines which they will invariably find. It must be like mentally pretty exhausting to play against them. Because that's a... Yeah, like it's just looking at it. It's really well equipped to pick holes in any team that has sort of chemistry problems, I think. On that point though, is this blueprint that is followable by any other team other than Bournemouth? I mean, can I mention Bournemouth who were last year to be Arsenal? I feel like, okay, cool. This is maybe a way you could be Arsenal if you surprised them doing it. But I can't imagine that many other teams being able to do this. No, I mean, I was watching it and because I was outsideing then I was able to watch the 90 minutes in my... When I was watching it, I didn't have... I wasn't thinking, oh, here's how you be Arsenal. No. I think my takeaway was, Arsenal standards are a little bit lower than I expected them to be here. So if you look at... Okay, so the first two goals, lovely brilliant goals, great strikes. But then you watch the actions of several Arsenal defenders involved in your thinking, where's the aggression? Where's that sort of the competitiveness that you come to expect in those jewels, wasn't there? The third goal was about as an Arsenal goal to concede as possible because it's just very simple set piece, which came at scores at the back post. And it's just, there's no contest. He's free on the edge of the six-year box. And so I don't think you're going to have coaches up and down the country thinking, right, this is how we're going to do it. It's going to be... How do you compete with Arsenal? Because I think that's the key right there. They're talented in a lot of ways. But they're also... They have a devil of a team in a way, right? They're nasty, they're nuggety. They can play that discipline. They're defensively really, really good. They can find goals in games whether or not playing particularly well. They're all the things you needed to be for a champion. I mean, this is sort of too cryptid to eat as a compliment. But yeah, there's no eureka moment for the rest of the league here. They also kind of lack really extreme pace Arsenal. Like they have quick-ish players, like Sacka and Solis. Solis is quick. Yeah, but I have versus quick, I guess. Yeah, but then none of them are like a solution to... So when they went long, you can go over if you've got quicker. They don't quite have attackers with that blistering pace. Like, say Martin Ellie had that was a really swatch beauty he had, whereas now their attacking players are all much more suited to when they have a team pend back rather than just trying to go over back over the top. He's in kind of habits, though, like suspiciously one of the fastest forwards in the league. Maybe over a long distance. I feel like he's sneakily... He's quite languid. He's got a really high top speed. So you think... You see him move and you're thinking that's not very quick because he makes it look quite effortless. I think he's one of those guys. Didn't he have a really good chance? Yeah. Yeah, I think he had more time than he realised he could have taken it on a stronger left but he tried to just do on his right and then went straight into the broken, but that would have only made it three-one. And actually, at one nail, I think, that was the Oda Guard chance where they break really, really well. It's a great counter-tide just missing a finish at the right point. But there were moments for them to get back in the game but it also seemed as if once they got to 2-0, it was a... We've got a 3-0 international break. A 3-week international break. The game's kind of lost. And I feel like... Well, yeah, and I also think... I'll tell you the kind of guy who every now and again probably doesn't hate it when his team drops a bad performance because it means he can get into a few players and make life uncomfortable and create a little bit of tension where he affirmly a fog in a standard. A little bit because he's... Everything we know about him you know, I thought he could probably have some great pieces about his diligence and how meticulous he is. He enjoys challenging players. It's a bad result like this where people are trying to write them off. Come on, that's kind of catnip to someone like Attetta, surely. Well, also it's worth saying. I mean, I'll reread a bit of that quote over at the beginning. After the game, obviously he was extremely disappointed. He said, we didn't respect any principal of play that you have to get out of those men-to-men situations which put us on the back for always. Rubens pointed about the pressing. It doesn't seem like it is a scenario where Michael Attetta has to go back to the drawing board and re-write the system. It seems more like... He believes that all of the... They have all the structures in place in order to get through situations like that, but the players didn't play well. I think it's a pretty good quote, Joe, to say to talk about they didn't respect the principals. I think that's absolutely right. I think that they were... They were outbattled. They were outbattled. Outthought. They weren't outthought. They weren't outthought. They weren't outthought. There was a few percentage points down on what you do to expect from them. Fair enough. They were outbought. This is not like... I sometimes feel like we're still stuck in that trap that you had in the 90s where you shouldn't lose to a team like Brighton therefore, when they do, you have to re-evaluate everything. It's just not the case anymore. Brighton are taking names. But Brent for just smash Chelsea on Friday night as well. On that note, it's a hat trick for Hurtzler of home wins against the reigning Premier League champions. I'm taking this from Aninalo's piece. Across each of his three seasons, having been Man City in 24 and Liverpool in the March of this year. Very cool. Also, I like it because it didn't hurt to get really pissed off the last Arsenal game last season where he said there's only one team that played who came here to play football. Being able to back up a year later is quite cool. I do find it funny and slightly immature when managers get that Cassie and press conferences. But he did have a point. That was one of the biggest, that was one of the all-time time-wastors. Has this guy... He has that in his personality. He always has that. Let's do Hurtzler because of friends and acquaintances who support big six teams who were talking about Hurtzler this weekend. You know, where you think I'll actually maybe come next summer. Maybe he's a name on the lips of big six fans. I don't know. I mean, it seems like premature to me on the basis that... He's 23. He's 21 years old or whatever he is. He struggled at times last season with Brighton. I'm very happy that he seems to be doing well and it's exciting for the league. Brighton is so good this summer. Also, it's partly because of that temper and like the way that he... He reminds me in that sense a little bit of Ruben Amorim in that, you know, one of the criticisms you could make of Ruben Amorim despite being very entertaining was that maybe he handled the media wrong. When he got into a bigger position at a club like Manchester United. Can you imagine Fabian Hurtzler managing a big six team? Yeah, absolutely. I think he's... So, his path through the game obviously St. Paulie to Brighton there's not a lot of exposure to big club environments or big media markets there. No. Even when he was at St. Paulie, I mean... Yeah, you first... You get Seb Stafford blood and then you get Liam Tharned and both of those things are pretty stressful. This is nothing to have in the league. These are friendly people. Yeah. To roll, to develop. Yeah, absolutely. He's technically capable of doing it. The personality... Do you think he's got the personality for it? I think it's one of those where you just have to wait for him to do it. So, he's combustible when in his first season as a senior head coach I think he was yellow card seven times by February from the time of Flaria. Yeah, he kept happening, didn't it? Yeah, right in as well. Yeah, there was actually... He had to go into... It's apparently quite small grounds. He just went in with the fans. They scored a very late equalizer in that game and he was sort of celebrating among the fans instead of trying to give it to the opposition fans the other side of the ground. He's a very entertaining guy in its passion for the game. Yeah. But he's a sort of person who... He's a little bit more mightish because he could be quite bullish. So if you have a bad result as a big team and there's that mandatory period of introspection after his wherever I want to analyze it he's the kind of guy I think that would be quite a matter of fact about what he thinks and that could put some noses out of joint. But then it's not fair to judge him until he does it because he's a smart enough person that he would know to adapt himself around the scale of the challenge and the job. So if he was to go and coach Manchester United for instance that you would probably see a slightly different Fabian Huzzler because he has the self awareness to adjust. And then it would all go terribly wrong but it wouldn't be his fault. But in the same way that he's done it already because he never managed in the Bundesliga he got promoted into it from his Vita Bundesliga and then immediately left. So to go from coaching some palli to go to Brighton that is a quantum leap in itself and being exposed to the Premier League environment that is huge, huge difference and he managed it. Also being as young as he is it's a very important skill to like manage older players that have a way more experience than you do. And I was watching a clip of him speaking to Gary Linnaker on Ores's football talking about how last season at times maybe he overcomplicated the tactics and players like Milner I think he referenced. We're telling him this so he kind of simplified it back down but without compromising on his principles of just counter pressing is everything. Seems to be his favourite thing. We do have to have a bit of that humility so that players like... It always reminds me of like AVB at Chelsea struggling to get like Terry and Lampard and Trock were onside. Yeah, so... That would be my main concern I suppose for him at a big 16. Obviously this is a premature conversation anyway but it's just because it's come to mind this weekend. I also worry that Brighton... I don't want to... denigrate the achievements of Brighton because it's incredible. Yeah, you want to. It's incredible. Same with Brentford. But there's the joke with Brentford that the coaches are made to look good by Brentford by the environment that they're in. And part of me does wonder that about Brighton on the basis of like... Potter. Yeah, deserving. I do wonder somewhat... I'm not just not to say that Fabian Hussler isn't a great coach but more to say that he's in the perfect environment in which to succeed. It's going to be a factor. In a toxic environment. I don't know. I'm not sure. Do you not make that the responsibility of a hiring club though because if you're looking to replace a coach and you're looking to install a new one, part of your job there is to understand why someone has succeeded in a different environment. And I think if you take a coach out of, say for instance, a take a coach out of Brentford to replicate what's allowed him to succeed doesn't make him a bad coach. It makes you a bad hireer. Which is why the definition here wouldn't be, say Fabian Hussler did go to a big 16 and failed, it wouldn't mean he was a bad coach. It would mean that it was a bad pick. There would be a very, very adoptive conversation that was so young. There would. Yeah. But assuming that it doesn't say anything about him specifically then what do you think the result would be? If you picked him out of Brighton today and dropped him in a big 16. It depends on what the big, which big 16 we were talking about. Chelsea. Well, actually, I don't want to do this too literally because it's quite antagonistic to Brighton fans given the history. But then I worry about Brighton fans. He's a modern coach in the sense that he understands that a head coach is not a king within a football club. And I still think there are coaches around who want to muscle their clubs around their personality. So a good example, was to call it by Munich, didn't work because he wanted to be about Thomas Dukele, which can never be. Has there someone who understands that a head coach in the modern game is an employee? I suspect that's one of the reasons why he works at Brighton because there's a slot for a head coach. You drop in, you do your job. You are a part of the recruitment conversation to an extent but not the be-all-end-all of it. And certain clubs, I mean, they've got four sporting directors and counting, I guess, yeah. So it really does depend because there's no such thing anymore as a big six environment. They're all different. He wouldn't get the United midfield pressing like he got the Brighton midfield, wouldn't he? Well, I'm not sure that anyone would. No, exactly. Maybe he could, though, because there's colors but labor there. Now, that's an overlap. But I also think the prickliness element of him is what he's like. But going back to what started this conversation off with the Arsenal stuff from the last season where he was complaining and saying he wanted to play football, that felt like a calculated strategy. So going into the game, he was talking about time wasting, time wasting. And there was kind of a thing around the league, completely unfounded, that Arsenal were time wasting at times last season. And I thought you guys would pick up on that. Steve Wright. Yeah, he was aware of that. And it was quite smart. And it did make it was a horrible game. And in a way, the performance wasn't that different from what we saw on Saturday. It's just Arsenal got an early goal that was quite fortunate, because it was a mistake from Bach for a program. And then they could defend for the rest of the game. They didn't get that early goal on Saturday. And then they got pecked with two goals later in the first half. Exactly that. These guys, they don't say anything by accident. So when someone at Hozor says that, there are very few head coaches, well, very few examples now where you see someone say something, you think, oh God, you're going to regret that, because that's a heat of the moment comment that's going to backfire. Right. Sometimes a strategic comment doesn't go the way a coach wants it to, but that comment, that was just, he knows what he's doing. He's a very, very intelligent person for intense, but he's also, you know, exactly sort of person that would have gameed that out on his mind. They can be very subtle as well, can't they? Should we play a quick game? I'm going to make three statements. Yeah. You tell me which one of them is designed to upset you, and which ones are just normal statements. Well, when you say normal, what do you mean just? Well, about performance. Okay. So for example, a statement number one. Yeah. I think you're doing quite a good job on the podcast today. Yeah. Okay. There's a lot to unpack in that. Do you want me to evaluate them one by one? No, I'm going to say them. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. The second one is, I appreciate the time that you've given us today. Yeah. Okay. The third one, I think you look very ugly. Which one do you think it was that was supposed to upset you the most? So am I factoring in our relationship? We've known each other for a long time. Right. I think it's the first one you're trying to say. Oh, yeah. Because you are quite well. Exactly. You are playing with my natural insecurity. That's right. Yeah. And you have no insecurity about your uglyness. That's just... That was spent years ago. That was spent years ago. That's right. That's what I am. His ego is completely dependent on how well he speaks. It's like throwing a quite... Oh, it's... No, 100%. Yeah. A quite... It's such a powerful read. Very potent. Very powerful, quite, quite, quite indeed. Now, listen, before we move on from Brighton, this is a quote from Liam Tharm's piece he wrote after the game. Centreback, Luca Buschovitz stood out for his aerial brilliance. This is, of course, an in the Arsenal game. Brighton's forwards knew they could press relentlessly because they had a backline more than capable of winning long balls from David Ryan. Now, Seb, you thought the Buschovitz might struggle a little bit in the Premier League? So far, so good. In fact, it's already prompted people online to say he's better than Van Hecker already, you know? What do you think? So, last year, he played at the base for back three for a very deep sitting Hamburg team. And that put the emphasis on his aerial ability, his one-on-one defending, very sort of fundamental parts of his game. We should say he was on loan from Spurs. He was on loan from Spurs. And then he went to Hamburg and then he was sold by Spurs, yes. There were times last season where his lack of acceleration, not speed, acceleration, and his body control were found wanting and they were exposed. And I remember thinking, if you go to the Premier League next season, there are going to be some moments like that where he's going to take some criticism and have to adapt to that and withstand some negativity. Hasn't happened so far and I'm delighted to be proved wrong. He seems to have settled really, really well. Then with hindsight, I think knowing what I do about how diligent he is about self-improvement, how much time he puts into video analysis, he would last season, there were times when before he was about to go on to the pitch for a warm-up, he'd be on the phone to his video analyst talking about what Union Berlin were going to do from certain crossing positions. He is a student of the game. How old is he? I think he's either just turned 20 or about to. That feels like a last minute cramming for an exam day. Can you know, have that conversation the day before? He is very invested in his career and improvement. Even those athletic things, he's been working with an athletic coach for a very long time. Do you remember Nicholas Flassich? No. His dad is a former, I think, the Catholic but very, very famous Croatian athletic trainer. He is well with him. He's been working on things like turning a circle, body position, foot position, acceleration. It's no surprise that he's adapted to the challenge. Like I've said earlier about environments and coaches, the same applies to players, where we've seen a centre back who did really well of Brighton go to Spurs and not do terribly, not do pretty good. He's been fine. But the team are not performing as you would hope. Everyone says Vuskovich is great. If Vuskovich had stayed at Spurs and was playing where Van Heck was playing now, he might have been doing fine. But the hype would not, you know what I mean? The environment is good. I think also, look at Vuskovich wanted to play and he wanted guarantees about his first team selection and for better or worse, Roberto D'Sobi wasn't willing to give them to him. He wanted to play. He was related to the profile saying you were mentioning earlier about him playing in a deep defence in the middle of a back three rather than like... Prof. Lombool. Possibly. Also, I think Roberto D'Sobi, given the nature of his career, is he going to be taught in coaching three years? I don't know. Right? So it's not necessarily not investing in a younger, longer term guy. He also has to win now. He's kind of 400 million pounds. I don't think you can guarantee that a 19-year-old gets to start in defence for a team like Spurs. I also think, and I'm guessing this is serious, not based on information, but if you were... If you're a Vuskovich and you had your eyes on one day playing for Real Madrid by Munich, then it's going to be harder to move to one of those clubs from Tottenham where there is a bit of more financial muscle than it would be from Brighton or a club that, as and when it's time for a player to move on, they're very happy to do a deal. That's their model. That's fine. So maybe there's a strategic path through the game aspect. I don't know if that's true. That's just my guessing. I like it. I like it as an idea. Okay, there we go. That was Arsenal. Neil. Three Brighton or the other way around. Let's have a quick break. And when we return, we will play a rondo with no cheating. As they've been cheating. There's been cheating. Can someone explain the cheating to me? Well, I can explain. And by the way, Steve will back from the break now. Just in case you didn't know. That little tiny pause there. That was the break. Now, that has been cheating, sir. There's been two bouts of cheating. One very... Did they both call JJ? No, no, no. No, he just gets handy clues on a play. And still got to see answers wrong. One bout of cheating was very cynical. The other was just an innocent perusal of the list by accident from me. I accidentally looked at the list and one game. And then I immediately recused myself from the game. So it was momentary cheating that didn't result in any kind of victory. The cheating... The cheating is from this little cheater over here. They call him the little cheater, Ruben Pimney. He gets away. He's got a very subtrubic angelic faith. That's true. You don't suspect him of being... You think he's a little angel? All I wanted to do was... I can't remember the touchy. You wanted to look up the answers. Yeah. It was classic cheating. It was like record signings or something. And I wanted to remind myself which teams existed. Yeah, he wanted to look at the teams. Which is a part of the answer. Sure, of course you don't. However, on last week's Thursday episode, our guest Hamza was writing down answers with a... Well, no. We don't know that he was doing that. We know he was writing down. He was using a pen. Yeah, he was using a pen. Nobody flagged him. No, because Hamza's a lovely innocent man. Hamza is that Hamza from the time? Yeah. Yeah. He was probably taking notes about a future story that he was going to work on. Yeah, he was supposed to notice from the run. That's different from under your nose. Yeah, whereas we know that you were cheating. So you're still the only person here. There's a little benefit of that after all this time. That's right. You knew the rules and you decided to break them. Now, the rules here are that Ruben has to close his laptop because he's a known cheater. You can keep yours open because you've done nothing wrong. I believe you. I believe you. You've done nothing wrong. It's a Rondo specifically. It is this game. It isn't. You'll be fine. Oh, 22 players who started. Yeah, actually. Well. Okay, here's how the Rondo works. I asked a question that has multiple correct answers. We go round in a circle. We give correct answers. If we give incorrect answers, we're rejected from the Rondo. If we give an answer that's already been given. Active listening. We're rejected from the Rondo. Today's category is as follows. What are the people down as there are? No, you can't. Oh, okay. There'll be no writing down. No, nothing. What are looking for? I'm not allowed to. Teams. Premier League teams that have finished 20th in the Premier League since the 2000-2001 season. There are 16 correct answers because obviously there are multiples. Why are we drawing the line at 2000-2001? Because I didn't want to do any research before that. Eight extra years takes me quite a long time. Actually, very convenient for me because that's when my footballing brain gained consciousness. Yeah, and people don't care about what happened in 1993. You know those people that say football existed before 92. No, it didn't. And also, it didn't exist before 2000. So, shut up. Okay. That's actually a legit point to make that it didn't exist. It's irrelevant before 92. But not for the reason people think. Not the invention of the Premier League. Sure. Different sport. Different sport completely. Harder to Google answers from the 90s as well. That's true, isn't it? It's harder to cheat in the early days. Now, as a senior member of this podcast, I strongly disagree, but I'm going to bite down along with it anyway. Now, sir, let's begin with you. Please give me the name of a team that's finished 20th since and including the 2000-2001 season. I want to take something obvious off the table. I'll go Derby County. Yes, Derby County. You can have 2007-08. That's absolutely correct. You look like you're going to say something else? I have a question. Yes. If a team finished, if it happened to a team twice, can you have the team? No, no, no, you have to just want one team. One team? Okay. There are teams on here that have done it multiple times. Yes. But there's still only one answer, can I? Sunderland. Sunderland are a correct answer. They've actually done it three times. Two thousand and two three five six and sixteen seventeen. Okay. Ruben. I have a redding, please. Redding is not a correct answer. Oh, no. As soon as he can't cheat, he's immediately nervous. Oh, yeah. Unbelievable. Unbelievable, isn't it? After all that conversation about cheating. Wow. I'm panicked. Oh, that is so bad. I will take Huddersfield Town. Oh. You can have Huddersfield Town. No, the reason I'm laughing is because I know that it will actually hurt Ruby. It's not for sure. I'm cheering. He will be. He'll talk about it in the office later. Okay. Can I go back to you? Portsmouth. Yeah. Portsmouth in nine-ten. You can have that. Okay. Step back to you. Burnley. Burnley is not a correct answer. Not under the company. Not a correct answer. What under? No. No. Even under company. I think there were nineteen. Who finished two finished twenty-thousand? Don't say it. I can't. You just said it. Yeah. Okay. I'm rolling out Southampton because I think it was Southampton who finished twenty-thousand. So you can't even call them as Southampton. Yeah. Also, 0405 and 2223. So I take them out. I was thinking of the 0405 team. There are many, many other correct answers left. Would you like a clue, kind of? No. Oh God. Because I know the clue. The answer is yes. Do you want a clue? I'd love a clue, yeah. The clue is that you know all of these teams. The answer... Is what? Do you have the six-seven? Yeah. Now, he didn't know that because it was 2006-7. You couldn't possibly remember that, yeah. Because you were an English manager. He was a manager. You were nine years old. But congratulations, Kaya. His name... Thank you. In a not particularly competitive... That was poor. That was bad. That was poor. That was bad. KPR on there. KPR on there. Yeah. That's the hoop to his team. That was thinking of. Knowledge, because... Yeah. I wasn't sure if they could... Knowledge are on their plenty. Every time they come up, they go... They did it in 2019-20. Yeah. Obviously went straight back up. It came straight back up and then immediately did it again. In 2021-22. Good for them. Other answers you could have had. Wolves have done it three times. Oh, yeah. West Ham has done it once. Wolves. How much album? I've done it twice. Sheffield United, of course. I've done it fairly recently. 23-24. Yeah. Lester City did it in 0102. Cardiff did it in 1314. The first answer on this. This is the first correct one was Bradford City. That was in 2000-2001. And Ashton Villa did it in 2015. Oh, yeah. It was really awful that day. That was the season that Geraldine Lescaugh tweeted a photo of a car. Right. And... Do you remember that? It was a deep pocket dial. Yeah. Yeah. When fans were giving him shit for playing terribly. Yeah. Kim Sherwood was there, man. Yeah. They had a dormitory. And a young Jack Grelish. Wow. Wow. And it just a gay. How about that? That's not bad pleasant. Yeah. Kind of amazing what they've done to turn it around. Yeah. Well, I kept hold of Grelish when they went down and he brought it back up. Yeah. Incredible. Incredible work. Okay. Right. There we go. That was the Rondo world under Kair, who's been named Rondo Del. Right. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Tactical Paradigm Shifts & The South Coast Blueprint: Auditing Brighton's Masterclass