🎙️ Football Social Daily •September 8, 2026 •⏱️ 26 min

Mike Dean, Emi Martinez and the Hill Dickinson can all get in the sea

1. Executive Overview: Core Theses & Key Revelations

The contemporary English football ecosystem exists in a perpetual tug-of-war between historical authenticity and hyper-commercialization. A single episode of the podcast Football Social Daily—specifically the "Get In The Sea" segment hosted by Nile, Joel Tudor, and Marley Anderson—serves as an extraordinarily candid autopsy of this cultural conflict. What begins as a weekly cathartic exercise in supporter frustration quickly escalates into a profound diagnostic of institutional decay, spatial alienation, and performative corporate branding within the Premier League.

At the epicenter of this discussion is the fallout from retired referee Mike Dean’s startling podcast disclosures. Dean’s admission that elite match officials engaged in pre-match "mini-games"—such as testing how long they could remain inside the center circle or artificially suppressing their whistles for the opening 20 minutes of top-flight matches—strips away the carefully curated veneer of PGMOL (Professional Game Match Officials Limited) professionalism. The host panel articulates how Dean’s vanity-driven anecdotes do not merely reflect individual hubris; they inflict systemic collateral damage upon the current refereeing cohort, validating decades of supporter skepticism regarding match manipulation, referee narcissism, and institutional bias.

Simultaneously, the podcast examines the spatial displacement of legacy supporter culture, epitomized by Everton Football Club’s transition from Goodison Park to the newly sponsored Hill Dickinson Stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock. Nile’s impassioned lamentation over the loss of Goodison Park highlights an understated crisis in modern sports architecture: the systematic replacement of historically rich, community-anchored football grounds with sterile, multi-purpose commercial venues. Through an architectural lens, the conversation contrasts the tactile, human-scale design of Archibald Leech with the modern stadium's concrete concourses engineered primarily for non-matchday yield and corporate hospitality.

Finally, Marley Anderson’s sharp critique of Emiliano "Emi" Martinez’s rapid squad number changes—wearing two distinct shirt numbers across his first two appearances for Chelsea—exposes the shallow performativity of modern player brand management. The panel deconstructs how once-sacrosanct squad numbering conventions have been transformed into transactional PR maneuvers, complete with scripted media statements regarding "seeking permission" from previous incumbents.

Together, these three thematic pillars establish the central narrative of the episode: modern elite football is suffering an acute crisis of integrity, where referees act as performative celebrities, historic grounds are liquidated for commercial real estate, and player identities are scripted by brand strategists. This analysis provides an exhaustive breakdown of the panel’s arguments, contextualizing them within the broader macroeconomic and structural trends governing global football.

2. Context & Background: The Landscape Leading to This Conversation

To fully grasp the resonance of the Football Social Daily discussion, one must evaluate the macroeconomic, technological, and regulatory pressures surrounding the Premier League at this specific historical juncture. Officiating integrity, stadium economics, and player image rights do not exist in isolation; they are interconnected nodes within an industry generating over six billion pounds in annual revenue.

In recent seasons, PGMOL has operated under unprecedented public scrutiny. The integration of Video Assistant Referees (VAR), high-profile operational errors, and recent scandals involving active match officials—most notably the David Coote controversy—have eroded public confidence to historic lows. Against this backdrop, retired referees entering the podcast ecosystem present a volatile variable. Unshackled from non-disparagement agreements and seeking media visibility, former officials frequently share behind-the-scenes anecdotes intended as lighthearted banter. However, in an age of data analytics and social media archive auditing, these admissions act as forensic evidence of systemic unreliability.

Concurrently, Premier League clubs face stringent Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR). These financial fair play constraints have accelerated the drive for revenue diversification. Traditional football grounds, constrained by dense urban footprints and aging infrastructure, cannot generate the matchday and non-matchday yields required to compete with elite financial superpowers. Everton’s departure from Goodison Park—a fortress constructed in 1892—represents the inevitability of financial necessity colliding with emotional heritage. Moving to Bramley-Moore Dock provides commercial expansion, corporate suites, and multi-use event capabilities, but it forces supporters to navigate the psychological trauma of spatial severance.

Furthermore, the explosion of player-centric digital media has transformed squad numbers and kit launches into sophisticated marketing campaigns. Players are no longer merely athletes representing a local institution; they are international commercial brands managed by athlete management agencies. The trivialization of squad numbers—historically tied to tactical positions and legendary club lineages—reflects a broader trend where every touchpoint of football culture is optimized for social media engagement and merchandise sales.

3.1 The Narcissism of Officiating: Mike Dean and the Compromise of Professional Integrity

The most explosive segment of the episode focuses on Mike Dean’s recent media appearances, where the veteran referee revealed personal anecdotes regarding his officiating career. Dean’s admission that he and colleagues played manufactured "mini-games"—challenging themselves to remain restricted to the center circle or deliberately refraining from blowing the whistle for up to 20 minutes—drew blistering criticism from Joel Tudor and Nile.

Joel Tudor’s condemnation was swift and absolute, framing Dean as an attention-seeking figure who prioritized self-aggrandizement over the fundamental duties of officiating. Tudor argued that referees exist solely to enforce the laws of the game without becoming the focal point of public entertainment. By boasting about side quests on popular podcasts, Dean effectively brought his former profession into grave disrepute. Tudor emphasized that supporters do not purchase tickets or tune in to broadcasts to observe refereeing theatrics, declaring that officials must cease trying to position themselves as media stars.

Nile expanded on the systemic implications of Dean’s disclosures. He pointed out that every active Premier League referee now operates under an intensified cloud of suspicion. When a official with over 550 top-flight matches under his belt admits to self-imposed constraints during live matches, supporters naturally infer that current officials are engaged in similar frivolities. Nile noted how social media users immediately began conducting forensic audits of Dean’s match archives on public databases, cross-referencing his whistleless periods against obvious missed fouls. High-profile fixtures—such as the 2008 FA Cup Final between Portsmouth and Cardiff City—were re-examined by aggrieved supporters seeking evidence of Dean's self-interested officiating games.

The panel also highlighted Dean’s appearance on The Overlap, where he explicitly named Arsène Wenger as a manager he disliked. Joel Tudor underscored how such explicit admissions dismantle the foundational principle of refereeing neutrality. In an elite competitive environment where minor refereeing decisions carry multi-million-pound consequences, a referee publicly admitting personal animosity toward a manager retroactively compromises every decision made against that club during his tenure. Tudor noted that a professional official should maintain absolute neutrality in public discourse, rather than feeding broadcast narratives for personal media attention.

Dean’s subsequent Instagram defense—claiming he always applied the laws to the best of his ability and preferred a high threshold for physical contact—was dismissed by Nile as insincere damage control. The panel concluded that Dean’s behavior highlights an acute psychological issue within modern refereeing: the rise of the celebrity referee who feeds on controversy to secure lucrative post-retirement broadcasting careers.

3.2 Architectural Dislocation: The Hill Dickinson Stadium and the Erasure of Football's Soul

Nile opened the "Get In The Sea" feature with a passionate critique of Everton Football Club’s new home at Bramley-Moore Dock, commercially named the Hill Dickinson Stadium. Despite acknowledging that he had not yet attended a fixture in person and recognizing the facility's state-of-the-art infrastructure, Nile argued that the venue lacks the soulful identity intrinsic to Goodison Park.

Nile’s argument centered on the loss of architectural heritage. Goodison Park, designed by the legendary Scottish architect Archibald Leech, embodied the classic era of British football stadium design. Leech’s signature elements—the double-decker stands, criss-cross steel latticework, timber seats, and tight proximity of supporters to the pitch touchlines—created an acoustic atmosphere and spatial intimacy that defined Everton’s home identity for over thirteen decades. Nile expressed profound disappointment that modern venue construction prioritizes commercial symmetry and multi-event versatility over distinct club character.

Joel Tudor countered Nile’s nostalgic stance by arguing that stadium identity is not an inherent architectural property present on day one; rather, it is forged through decades of historic events, dramatic derby victories, and shared supporter experiences. Tudor noted that when Goodison Park opened in the late 19th century, it too was a blank canvas devoid of immediate historical baggage. He cautioned against romanticizing obsolete infrastructure, pointing out that Goodison Park suffered from severe structural limitations, including obstructed sightlines caused by support beams, cramped timber concourses, and decaying facilities unfit for modern spectator safety.

However, Marley Anderson and Nile highlighted a broader structural trend: the transformation of football grounds into generic corporate entertainment hubs. Drawing parallels with the New Wembley Stadium, Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, and Atletico Madrid’s Estadio Metropolitano, the panel observed how modern stadium designs rely on vast concrete concourses and standardized seating layouts. While these facilities maximize non-matchday revenues through music concerts and corporate events, they often feel like neutral host venues rather than sacred fortresses. The conversation underscored the emotional dislocation felt by matchgoing supporters when financial imperatives dictate the demolition of architectural landmarks.

3.3 Squad Number Plasticity and the Performative Scripting of Modern Football Culture

Marley Anderson introduced a critique of player shirt number dynamics, taking specific aim at Chelsea’s recent signing, goalkeeper Emi Martinez. Anderson highlighted the absurdity of Martinez wearing squad number 26 during his debut fixture, only to discard it a week later in favor of number 1 after it became vacant. Over his first two official appearances for Chelsea, Martinez wore two completely different shirt numbers—a situation Anderson characterized as emblematic of modern football's superficiality.

Anderson’s frustration extended beyond the mere mechanics of squad number changes to the performative media protocol surrounding them. In contemporary football PR, when a player adopts an established or recently vacated number, media departments orchestrate scripted statements where the incoming player asserts that they contacted the previous shirt holder to request formal "permission." Anderson labeled this trend as fundamentally plastic and insincere, designed to project an artificial veneer of respect and tradition while serving purely as a marketing exercise for kit sales and social media content.

The panel agreed that squad numbers have been stripped of their traditional romanticism. Historically, squad numbers 1 through 11 signified positional roles and tactical structure, while high squad numbers represented academy graduates earning their place. In the modern era, shirt numbers are heavily commercialized personal branding assets managed by player representatives. The rapid swapping of numbers across consecutive matchweeks undermines the fan experience—particularly for matchgoing supporters who purchase customized shirts—and reflects an era where player optics are strictly managed by public relations handlers.

3.4 The Crisis of Fan Distrust and PGMOL Media Governance

Synthesizing the discussion on Mike Dean, the panel examined the broader breakdown of trust between football supporters, broadcast media, and officiating governance bodies. The proliferation of digital media platforms and football podcasts has created an appetite for unvarnished back-room stories. However, when retired officials monetize their careers by sharing irresponsible anecdotes, they destroy the fragile credibility of active match officials.

Joel Tudor highlighted that PGMOL lacks robust governance regarding media engagements for former referees. Unlike elite corporate organizations that enforce non-disparagement and confidentiality agreements to protect operational integrity, refereeing bodies have allowed high-profile retirees to trivialize the sport's officiating standards on public platforms. This governance void leaves active referees vulnerable to accusations of corruption, bias, and unprofessional conduct whenever a controversial decision occurs on the pitch.

The hosts emphasized that football officiating requires an absolute commitment to institutional transparency rather than individual media stardom. When retired referees use podcasts to perform as comedic entertainers, they validate the narrative that elite match officials operate with an aura of untouchable arrogance. The panel called for stringent regulatory protocols governing how officiating experiences are communicated to the public, stressing that until refereeing institutions prioritize professionalism over media visibility, supporter distrust will continue to fester.

4. Speaker Perspectives & Analytical Contrast

The dynamic of the Football Social Daily panel relies on the distinct journalistic and supporter perspectives brought by Nile, Joel Tudor, and Marley Anderson. Their debate over refereeing standards, stadium relocation, and player branding reveals contrasting analytical philosophies regarding the evolution of modern football.

Nile operates as the emotional custodian of football heritage. His perspectives are rooted in traditional supporter culture, where spatial authenticity, historical continuity, and organic matchday atmosphere paramountly outweigh economic optimization. Nile’s vehement opposition to the Hill Dickinson Stadium stems from an intense emotional attachment to Archibald Leech’s classic architecture and the romantic identity of Goodison Park. On the officiating front, Nile approaches Dean’s comments with deep concern for institutional integrity, recognizing how casual admissions of misconduct fuel supporter cynicism across the entire football pyramid.

Joel Tudor provides a pragmatically iconoclastic perspective. While sharing Nile’s outrage over Mike Dean’s narcissism, Tudor rejects uncritical nostalgia regarding stadium infrastructure. He views stadium evolution as an inescapable reality, maintaining that history is created through performance and longevity rather than concrete and timber. Tudor’s primary focus centers on governance and professional standards; he demands absolute accountability from referees, viewing their foray into podcast entertainment as an unacceptable breach of professional duty.

Marley Anderson injects sharp cultural cynicism into the dialogue, focusing on the commercial fetishism and public relations scripting of contemporary football. Anderson’s critique of Emi Martinez’s shirt number swapping highlights his disdain for manufactured corporate narratives. He views modern football through a media-critical lens, identifying how clubs and players sanitize every interaction to maximize commercial engagement at the expense of genuine sporting tradition.

Analytical Pillar Nile (The Traditional Custodian) Joel Tudor (The Governance Pragmatist) Marley Anderson (The Media Critic)
Mike Dean & Refereeing Integrity Focuses on the systemic damage to public trust and the retrospective auditing of match archives by supporters. Demands strict professional boundaries; views Dean's behavior as vanity-driven disrepute that undermines active referees. Highlights the absurdity of retired officials transforming into media personalities to gain public approval.
Stadium Relocation (Hill Dickinson vs. Goodison) Laments the loss of Archibald Leech’s unique architectural soul, spatial intimacy, and acoustic identity. Argues that stadium soul is built over decades of sporting history, rejecting obsolete infrastructure nostalgia. Critiques the rise of generic, multi-purpose corporate venues that prioritize non-matchday commercial revenue over fan experience.
Player Branding & Shirt Numbers Views rapid number changes as alienating to matchgoing fans who invest in customized merchandise. Considers squad number dynamics secondary to performance but agrees that PR scripting is insincere. Denounces shirt number swapping and scripted "permission" media statements as plastic corporate PR maneuvers.

5. Strategic & Industry Implications

The issues debated on Football Social Daily carry profound strategic implications for sports governing bodies, football club executives, stadium architects, and sports marketing agencies. The insights emerging from the panel’s analysis signal critical friction points that the global football industry must address to maintain long-term commercial viability and supporter trust.

5.1 PGMOL Governance and Media Gagging Clauses

Mike Dean’s podcast disclosures expose an urgent regulatory deficit within PGMOL. As officiating decisions face unprecedented scrutiny under VAR, refereeing bodies can no longer afford to let retired officials freely monetize operational anecdotes that undermine the game's integrity. PGMOL must implement comprehensive post-retirement non-disparagement agreements and strict media protocols. These contracts should restrict former officials from disclosing internal officiating bets, personal managerial biases, or non-standard officiating practices. Furthermore, PGMOL must overhaul its public relations strategy, transitioning away from personality-driven referee media appearances toward institutional transparency regarding VAR audio and decision-making logic.

5.2 Architectural Balancing: Yield Optimization vs. Spatial Identity

Everton’s move to Bramley-Moore Dock illustrates the complex architectural challenge facing elite clubs. Modern venue construction requires maximizing corporate hospitality, premium seating, and non-matchday multi-use capabilities to satisfy financial regulations. However, club executives and stadium design firms must avoid creating clinical, identity-free arenas. Architects must consciously integrate historical design cues—such as steep terracing angles, close proximity to touchlines, and distinct acoustic engineering—to preserve home-field advantage and emotional continuity. Demolishing heritage grounds without translating their spatial magic into new builds risks alienating core season-ticket holders and diminishing the club's organic brand power.

5.3 Commercialization Limits in Athlete Brand Management

The backlash against Emi Martinez’s shirt number maneuvering serves as a clear warning to sports marketing professionals. While squad numbers represent valuable merchandise assets, over-commercializing player image rights creates supporter friction. Sports agencies and club media departments must exercise restraint in scripting player interactions. Forcing manufactured PR narratives regarding squad number etiquette damages brand authenticity. Clubs should establish clear seasonal deadlines for squad number registration to protect matchgoing supporters from purchasing obsolete merchandise and maintain respect for squad numbering traditions.

6. Looking Ahead: Unresolved Questions & Next Milestones

As the Premier League season unfolds, the long-term impact of refereeing transparency, stadium migrations, and player branding trends will remain central themes for football analysts and industry leaders. Several critical metrics and upcoming milestones will dictate how these structural issues resolve over the coming years.

Key Variables & Institutional Metrics to Watch

  • PGMOL Media Policy Reform: Will PGMOL introduce strict media guidelines or non-disclosure agreements for retired match officials to prevent future podcast disclosures that damage officiating credibility?
  • Everton Supporter Sentiment at Bramley-Moore Dock: How quickly will the atmosphere at the Hill Dickinson Stadium evolve? Will matchgoing supporters successfully replicate the organic acoustic intensity of Goodison Park, or will the venue remain perceived as a neutral commercial arena?
  • Digital Archive Auditing Trends: Will fan-led social media investigations into past refereeing performances force governing bodies to publicly clarify historical match decisions and officiating standards?
  • Kit Commercialization Policies: Will Premier League regulations tighten around mid-season or rapid early-season squad number changes to protect consumers from predatory merchandising shifts?

The candid discourse on Football Social Daily underscores that football cannot be governed purely as a financial asset or media spectacle. When refereeing integrity is sacrificed for podcast soundbites, historic grounds are replaced by sterile corporate venues, and player identities are reduced to public relations campaigns, the fundamental bond between supporters and the sport is severely strained. Protecting football’s future requires a deliberate realignment: restoring strict professionalism to officiating governance, embedding historical soul into modern stadium architecture, and respecting the authentic heritage that gives global football its enduring power.

💬 Key Quotes & Speaker Breakdown

Mike Dean / Refereeing integrity

"Mike Dean, I'm throwing you into the sea with full weights on your legs... saying that they used to do little games before games of how long can you stay in the center circle for before you need to move away or how long can you go in the game without blowing the whistle."

— Joel Tudor

"I've seen the quotes coming out... I honestly thought foolishly, this won't be as bad as expected. But I also knew that as soon as he said it, that everybody with a little bit too much time on their hands will be going back crawling the games on the database."

— Nile

Refereeing integrity

"Mike Dean has brought his profession into disrepute because now everyone is looking at the current crop of Premier League referees and going, 'Well, are they deliberately not giving decisions because they're playing a bit of a mini game with their mates?'"

— Nile

Refereeing standards

"Referees need to stop going off onto podcasts and pretending they're big stars. They're there to referee the game and that is it. Nobody turns up to go and watch them."

— Joel Tudor

Emi Martinez / Chelsea transfers

"Emi Martinez won number 26 in his debut for Chelsea... a week later, number one became available, he fucked off the number one, he's already played two games this season for Chelsea, he's won two different fucking numbers."

— Marley Anderson

Mike Dean / Refereeing bias

"He [Mike Dean] could answer that question [about managers he didn't like] with 'all 400 of the managers I met in my career, everyone was a bell end at one point.' But he brings it on himself because he likes that center of attention."

— Joel Tudor

Everton's new stadium

"I'm throwing the Hill Dickinson Stadium into the sea. It's not Everton's Stadium, is it? It's not. Everton's Stadium is Goodison Park and always will be."

— Nile

Player shirt numbers

"The thing that I hate is when a certain number gets taken by a new player, they have to say something to the media, like 'I spoke to the guy who used to wear this shirt and he says he's given his permission.' It's just so plastic, the whole thing."

— Marley Anderson
📜 View Full Episode Verbatim Transcript 29,621 characters
It's the Tuesday on Football Social Daily, which means, for this new season, it is time for Get In The Sea, yes, we have changed our weekly Monday feature to a Tuesday, and it's got its own dedicated podcast. You asked for it, so you're gonna get it. If you've never joined us for Get In The Sea before, it's an absolutely shocking name. We all hate it, bit like the name of the podcast football social daily, but we'll start with it now, and you guys seem to like it, so anyway, you get what you want. It is where we moan about something over the weekend in the Premier League that has wound us up, that has annoyed us something that we want to get off our chest, never to be seen again, so we cast it to the bottom of the deep blue sea. My name is Nile, joined today by Joel Tudor and Marley Anderson for our weekly therapy session, and I've got a couple of things I want to get off my chest. How about you boys, are you feeling suitably annoyed after the weekend's Premier League action? I've got a significant one, and maybe I'm guessing one of you will have it as well, but you know, like when Houdini used to do those tricks where he used to put the weight on him and then go into the river and then come back up, this man ain't coming back up, I'm telling you, he's not escaping this magic trick, and I think one of you is well having there. It was putting me in a lot of area for the hundreds of times I reckon. Yeah, a few things got me this weekend, but mine's a bit more niche, I don't think anyone will guess what mine's going to be, but it can still go into sea. It's roomy usual sauce, but for a reason that only happens rarely and should never happen. Yeah, because you say it's roomy usual sauce, I just want you to rule out that it's not Jürgen Klopp, because even though he's not in the Premier League anymore, it's normally something to do with him. Michael Atteter is well and truly overtook Jürgen Klopp for the most annoying manager in the Premier League, especially with his antics again yesterday for Arsenal Chelsea on Sunday, sorry. Well, mine is the most tame of all of the suggestions by the sounds of it, having assessed what YouTube had to say. So I'll go first, and this will come as no surprise to regular listeners. I'm throwing the Hill Dickinson Stadium into the sea. How are you playing? How are you managing to do that? Well, pretty easy. It's first fucking right next to the sea. Just keep it off the edge into Bromley Duck or whatever it is. Just a few sledge hammers and it might slip down into the mercy. But the reason I'm putting it in and admittedly, I've never been to the Hill Dickinson Stadium and it looks like a great venue to watch live sport, but it's not Everton's Stadium, is it? It's not. Everton's Stadium is good at some park and always will be, and I know long-time listeners of the podcast will be rolling their eyes going, Nile, you've always said, how much you love good at some park, get over it, Everton don't play there anymore, but the thing is, the Premier League and English football, it's got a soul to it, it's got a character to it. I know when I turn on the telly to watch a football match, what ground I'm watching. Some of them look the same as the others. When you turn on the TV and you watch an Everton game, you know that that's good at some park. You can see the Archibald Leech Latter Singh on the old stand, you can see the beams that are keeping the roof up, Gladys Streep, the fans are tight to the pitch, it's got a soul that's got a character, yes it's a brand new stadium that Everton have got, and it's going to take time for that character to develop, but at the minute, doesn't have that. Just watching the game against Manchester United at the weekend on the TV and admittedly, I've never been to the Hill Dickinson, so my view might change if I go there in person. It didn't feel like I was watching Everton at home, it felt like I was watching a game being played in a neutral venue. I think you've answered your own question though, they need time to build history there for you to become accustomed to it, because let's not forget, I can imagine when they first moved into Goodison Park, I know there was no previous one to go off, so it was just the kind of, this is our home now, but that took decades and decades and decades of history and you could be grace in the great pitch and, you know, all these different things to happen, just for it to say. Of all the great players Everton have had over the years, and all of the trophies they won, you picked up your cube who was the man, so you could be grace in Goodison with his presence and giving it the history of the ball up. I was about to say, for Laney and Layton Baines, but, no, it needs these kinds of kiosks and these kinds of, I could go on and don't let me go down a rabbit hole now. It needs these moments of history and trophies and moments, magic moments, last minute, minute winners, derbies, that kind of thing. I think you're some, I get what you mean, because even when I watched it from the TV, if you removed all the blue and then just had a camera on it, I would have thought it was like a Tottenham stadium or something, you know, because they all look quite similar. Yeah, I don't think it's blue enough. I think that's one of my criticisms of it. I don't think it's a blue enough venue. I think it's not as Everton as it should or could be. I remember going to the New Wembley for the first time, underneath the stand in the Concourse, just concrete, nothingness. There's no soul there. There's nothing to make it feel like it's our national stadium. It just feels like a venue and I think Everton needs to be really careful that the Hill Dickinson Stadium doesn't just feel like a venue where Everton play. It needs to feel like Everton's home and yes, there's only been their home for a year and I totally agree with you and I know that that was always going to be the answer to the question. It's only been one season, so what do you expect? I just think it's difficult to digest that a lot of stadiums now are just becoming venues to watch Premier League football rather than a home ground. This is where X team plays. The same thing will happen to Manchester United, when they move to their new stadium. Oh, I know. 100% and I dread the day, but at the same time, it's like almost leaving your childhood home, isn't it? And then you're leaving behind all those memories. It's not a building anymore, it's more like a story book isn't it? And then you're leaving to go to a new one. And it's basically just like a blank canvas of we need to create heritage. Now, I don't know if you're talking about the design more than anything, or just the feel. The whole thing in it, really. It's the whole package in it, suppose. I think it looks great from the outside. I mean, I would love to go in it and just have a feel for how it is on a game day. Because I think it's probably very different how it is on a screen because I've been to the goodest thing in the away ending. That was awesome. But like, I would never have got that feeling just from a TV screen. Yeah. And I think it's a lot of it is Stockholm syndrome. And I think about this quite often, actually, when it comes to football in the modern era, and whether I'm actually turning into one of those, it was better in my day, people, or whether it actually was better when we were growing up. But because you're always going to look back on things more fondly. But the football grounds that were built by Archibald Leech, who was the prolific designer who designed Fratton Park and Goodison Park and Ibrox and Roker Park and some of these amazing stadiums. I think Old Trafford is where he designed one of the original stands that Old Trafford back in the day. You know, it was kind of like a calling card of his. And he was at the foundation of the building of football stadium as we know it in this country. So the design, I'm kind of biased because I like the Archibald Leech design stadiums because that's what I'm used to and that's what I knew growing up. I suppose whatever to want from it, they want to be able to have a commercial element to their football club where they can get concerts and other sporting events. And you know, the Premier League has become that now, hasn't it? And it just, I guess the reason I lament it is just because it's another indication of the way the Premier League has gone where it is more about how much money can be made as a business. It's more about the commercial and not about Everton Football Club in the community in Liverpool. And I guess it just reminded me of that watching that the weekend. Yeah, I mean, I bet there's a record number of stadiums being built in the last 15 years. And I think football has just reached a point like crabs in a book, isn't it? They're all trying to get the last remaining scrap, so many additional revenues and I remember being in the, the one in metropolitan or for the bad bunny concert in June. And you just think in the Bernabé, you're probably wants this concert, you know, they're almost battling each other's rival neighbors to make sure that they get these big events in and they make sure that the concourse is a correct don't get me wrong. In goodison part, let's not forget. And I know you have good memories on the surface. But the seats were flipping wood and the call concourses were just not fair for put. Yeah, it was, it was all falling apart and even the beams would obstruct so much of your vision when you're in a certain part of the ground. So I like the nostalgia of it, Nile. But that's history. That is history. Why would you, why would you raise that? It can't stand forever though. It can't stand the test of time. You have to move on at some point with it with it. No, I do understand that. But why would you erase it? I just can't, you can't, you can't do it in a dream on just because you want to live your three-go to play. Just because you want to, you want to be able to play it your ground. It's just fucking stupid. It's so vicious now. You know it's not because the owners are going to flip your rock on for a Libya Roger ego. I know, I know, but this is called getting the sea for a reason, Joel. So just let me have five minutes, all right? Joel, Joel, all Nile wants his actual leaf leech to rise from the dead, create a few new stadiums and he'll be happy, but he's been dead since 1939, so he's not coming back. So this is how we do things now, mate. That's what it is. I don't mind you boys slagging me off, but slagging archipold leech, that's a step too far. That is a step too far. I'm not slagging him. I'm just saying he's been definitely under his eyes as a fact. Let's go through some of the stadiums just quickly. Craven Cottage, beautiful stadium, yeah? Iconic, design, old shape, fallen apart. Maybe that's a redo, like a whole couple of stands as well. Literally, it's probably the most premier league stadium that's in Dindra fallen in the sea because it's right on the terms before the, before it's done, that's not built anymore, is it? You know outside Villa Park, the big Victorian brickwork, beautiful, same as Ibrox, it's got a very similar thing. They're getting a new stand as well, aren't they, us the Villa? That was weird seeing the big construction site with all the construction workers passing back the ball. Well, there's not many archipold leech designed stands left. I mean, hearts demolished theirs, goodest and gone. So it feels like a lot of them are becoming more and more rare sites to see. Anyway, that's me getting that off of my chest. That was quite tame compared to what you boys have got. Joel, you were pretty strong in what you were suggesting you were going to put in the sea. So maybe I'll save you to the end, Marley, over to you with your niche suggestion. Mine's niche, but from a usual suspect. The usual suspect is Emmy Martinez. The reason why is that I hate, it doesn't just happen at Chelsea, but it does happen at Chelsea seemingly more often than other clubs. The thing that I hate is when a certain number gets taken by a new player, they have to say something to the media, as in like along the lines of, I spoke to the guy who used to wear this shirt and he says he's given his permission that I wear it. Now, Emmy Martinez won number 26 in his debut for Chelsea the other week when they played. They played after, no, they played after Fulham, because Sanchez was in goal for Fulham. Then they played somebody else, and he won number 26 and the whole thing was John Terry came on, did an interview and said, oh yeah, Emmy Martinez spoke to me and I said it was okay for him to have the number six and the 26 and the reason why is that he hates conceding goals as much as I have, as much as I did, and nearly fucking puked when I heard that fuck off, you cringe bastards, you pair of cringe gates, that's disgusting. Oh, he hates conceding goals and I hate conceding goals, so he can have the number 26. Guess what happened? A week later, number one became available, he fucked off the number one, he's already played two games this season for Chelsea, he's won two different fucking numbers, so he went for 26 for one week, and all of a sudden this, this, oh, pining, pining, deep, meaningful conversation about a number with John Terry has now gone down the shitter and he's wearing number one like every other fucking goalkeeper. Get in the suit. I mean, you could get in the suit regardless, so I'm very, very much with you either way. Although to perhaps give him a small piece of driftwood to cling onto, if he is trying to keep himself above water, Emmy Martinez did offer after making the change from number 26 to number one to personally sign at the Chelsea Club shop, all of the shirts of the kids and hopefully not grown men who have bought a Martinez 26 jersey, he offered to personally sign them all. I don't know when that's going to happen or if there is anyone who bought a Martinez 26. How many possible, how many possible people could be making the way to Stanford Bridge? Like, you know, I'd be asking in that situation, can I buy a 26 shirt, just so he then signs it and I can vlog it an e-bay for a few quid. You can imagine there's a couple of dads who's turned up like with an extra last shirt. Oh, can you sign this for my son, he's named Derek, it's like, yeah, but it's an extra large mate. He's got, he's got any of that. He's a big lass, he likes his chips, yeah. Well, it happened a couple of seasons ago as well when Koolaballi signed for Chelsea and he's taught number 26 and the exact same thing happened, there was a video of Koolaballi talking to Terry on speakerphone in the back of a car on his way to his unveiling, saying, oh, boss, is it all right, if I take the number 26, yeah, of course you can, Calidoo, you're going to smash him, are you going to be amazing? Six months later, he's fucked up to Saudi Arabia because he was dog shit. It's just so plastic, the whole thing. It's just a number. It's just a number. You're going to get a certain point where you'll get a defender who goes to Chelsea and because it's been so badly tainted after John Terry, you'll be like, yeah, I spoke to John Terry on the phone, he told me, can you fuck up my number, go and get something else? Can you tell me anything you want? You don't Chelsea need to do the next time they give them what someone the number nine shirt, they should have to ring Steve Sidwell, Calid Boolaroos, Mateja Kesman and all these shit number nine, then just say, I'm going to be better than you. And then at least you've done some original and funny about it because this whole or 26 is the legendary number, it's just not, just isn't, just leave it, it's bizarre, get and see. Absolutely solid, get in the scene, nomination, they're Marley, I've no qualms with that whatsoever. No, no, I can't even argue with it. No, no, it's yet, no, exhibit A, that's what get in the scenes all about, it's not about somebody got kicked in the head and he should have been sent off a blah, blah, blah, it's for petty little shit like that, that is the epitome of getting the seal of it. But now, Joel's got a serious one, so I'm, there's the two types of getting the seas, go on Joel. Yeah, this one triggered something deep within me where I feel like they need to be a nationwide ban and that is on referees going on podcast because Mike Dean, I shook yourself into the sea with full weights on your legs because I don't know if anyone's seen this, but anyone who didn't see what he said, obviously my Dean, former referee, former, absolutely insufferable referee who love to make everything about him still wants to make things about him by going on a podcast and saying that they used to do little games before, sorry, these did do little games before games of how long can you stay in the center circle for before you need to move away or how long can you go in the game without blowing the whistle and allowing a game to go on and you like said it with such, you know, superiority complex. If I'm the dog's bollocks and I'm the one who refs it as if it's like some kicking the park like this is people's jobs on the line for God's sake. It's like one of the most is the most is the biggest league in the world with so much importance on it. And then you've got these and don't get me wrong when I listened to the interview and I saw like how he was saying it did not me did not surprise me for one minute that this was coming from his mouth because remember I always remember goth crooks when he did that segment on a football focus when he was so, you know, harsh on my demons like the games about the games, not about you, my Dean, you know, always wanted to be the center of attention and I really went off on him and he was absolutely bang on because my Dean drawing games as much as everybody likes his theatrics and as much as everybody liked him to, you know, be very dramatic on the pitch. He just shows behind the scenes what an absolute hit he was by the fact that they were literally making a mockery of the game by doing all these mini little side quests. Go and referee the game for God's sake, we don't and as a side note to that, referees need to stop going off on to podcast and pretending these big stars, I've genuinely had enough. They're there to referee the game and that is it. Nobody turns up to go and watch them as much as my Dean loves everyone to watch him. It needs to go is done. I feel like the bringing themselves more into disrepute by bringing all these small stories. They're going to say the thing in the future. Yeah, it's like, my Dean as brought his profession into disrepute because now everyone is looking at the current crop of Premier League referees and going, well, are they deliberately not given decisions because they're playing a bit of a mini game with their mates and having a laugh. It's, you know, he refereed over 550 Premier League matches and if he said a couple of times he did it, well, how many times is a couple of times? If he does that 10% of the time, that's a season and a half's worth of games. Yeah, it's incredible because then you start to think, is there more than meets the eye here with you doing other things and I don't, I'm not putting accusations and that kind of thing, but it's not often that kind of words. Yeah, I said that. I had you not heard Mike Dean talking pure bollocks on a podcast. Completely brings referees into disrepute usually and he should be apologising to every single current Premier League referee Mike Dean, that's what he should be doing because the referees have been through enough with the David Coot situation recently and everything else that's gone on and obviously constantly under the microscope with the decisions that are made. But I agree with you, Joel, there's this old saying which is good referees are the ones you don't notice. If you don't notice the referee during a match, he's done a good job. But referees now are celebrities as part of the growing nature of Premier League's popularity. No, they like to think this celebrities, but they should not be, I mean, even my Dean went on, was it the overlap and he said, one of the fans in the kind of question areas had, who was the, or maybe Jamie Caragher actually said, who was the, who was the manager that you didn't get along with the most? In that situation, you should be very, very impartial and just say, listen, I tried to be as professional as a guy and he went straight away, I said, Venger, which is never sore eye to eye. So then you think, well, was that influencing your decisions that you're not there to see because why with the manager of the, this is why you're there to call it down the middle. Like he could, he could answer that question with all, all 400 of the, that I met with my career, everyone was a bell end at one point. You could make a, make a light of the situation, but he, he brings it on himself because he likes that center of attention. It's, I remember him in the stand that tranned me at that time, where he was almost like swinging his scarf around and stuff and it's like, you know, the camera's going to be on you. You're fucking weirdo. Like stop it. That's, that's what his, it got his ego going when he was a referee because he knew that if he did any kind of decision or any kind of mannerism or something that made the camera angle turn to him, all of a sudden he knows he's the center and I think he has some kind of superiority. He has a complex inside in that desires that attention because he made me never was caught out to be a footballer. So that was the next best alternative. And now they're all going on and being their own celebrities on these podcasts. But they're, they're saying too much, I feel like refereeing needs to have a kind of circle of secrecy where you don't go out and start saying all the, it's not like when a footballer comes out and says, oh, when they're manipulated and also had that pizza gate. I mean, that's fine. It's just a few players having a kind of what football players typically do. When a referee's coming out who has to be, first of all, impartial and second of all ultra professional and they're saying that they didn't see eye to eye with a certain manager and that they were playing games before an actual game itself to me is just, it just sends my mind into, okay, well, what games were they being played in there and why were they doing that? Was it because he didn't see eye to eye with us and then he meant that he was a little harsh with the decisions? You don't know where to stop with it. And that's why for me, I feel like referees need to, you know, quit while they're ahead. They've had a great career, probably paid very well. Go to the referees union in Saudi and go get paid by kind of refereeing and, you know, how a web goes or whatever. And just stay out of the line like, I just don't, I feel like, it's like a person who's fine who finds fame for the first time and then trips over themselves because they're enjoying people's reactions to what they're saying. I just don't, I don't get it for one instance. I feel like they need to stay out of that because they were never brought into, unless you want to speak about decisions like what some referees do when they go on sky and whatever find no problem. But when they start talking about little in the anecdotes and stuff, I'm not interested genuinely. What my dean has done is he's made himself look like more of a bellend than people already thought he was because if you look at what he posted on his Instagram on Friday, he never actually retracted his claim about not blowing the whistle for 20 minutes in a Premier League game once or twice. He actually said throughout my 20 years as a pro referee, I always applied the laws of the game to the best of my ability. My approach was to allow the game to flow and wherever possible I preferred to apply a high threshold for contact which the players liked. At no stage was it my intention to question criticise or undermine the integrity of refereeing in this country. I've always respected the profession and the responsibility that comes with being a referee. Well, I'm sorry Mike, you've done exactly that. You've absolutely brought into question, brought criticism and undermined the integrity of refereeing by nature of your very comments of saying that you deliberately played mini games. Now listen, there might have been one or two occasions in your 550 odd Premier League matches where you didn't blow the whistle for the first 20 minutes because that's the way the game flowed, but to say that you did it deliberately just for the laws to give yourself a kick takes the piss, it takes the piss and it makes you look like an absolute knob. Is that conclusively in the sea conclusively in the sea with concrete fucking boots on? I think that that should be a warning shot to anyone in the referee in profession. Do not get involved with podcasts with the media because as a referee and with how serious Premier League football is these days, there is always going to be something you say that it's going to get. I'm not saying this is taken out of context, but there will be things that you say that are taken in a certain way which don't land the way you want them to land. I think the best way to sum this up was the article that Alison Rudd wrote in the times where she said, poor Mike Dean will say almost anything to try and get people to like him. He honestly, he gives me a real interviewer bias, you know, he's doing anything to please them by getting a bit of laughs in the interview, forgetting that there's wider repercussions. So yeah, get those iron clad clogs on and jump into the nearest sea, my friend. Do you know what, on the on the Mike Dean thing, right? I've seen these, seen the courts coming out before, you know, as they come out, I think it was like last Thursday or something. And I honestly thought foolishly, this won't be as bad as expected. I thought he will say this and it's been taken out of context. I think he's probably said it as in, you know, I could go 20 minutes without blowing it away. So like Niles said before, I thought it would be just a misrepresentation of it. But I also knew that as soon as he said it, that everybody with a little bit too much time on the hands will be going back crawling the games on the database and looking at those games. And lo and behold, all across Twitter now, you see those games, you see those decisions, you see him playing those mini games, you see him not going out the center circle, you see him not giving stone wall fouls to certain opponents in things. And it's all age like, you know, like milk, it's lumpy and curdly and it makes him look bad. And it makes his colleagues look bad and it makes the PGM well. And we've already got a shit ton of shit on the plate right now. Look bad and it makes all future referees look bad. It makes the kids who start off at Sunday League and work the way up the pyramid. It makes them look bad and you should know that you should know that when you open your mouth, the likelihood of it doing more good than bad is so slim referees can't do anything good, 100% good because at least 50% of the people will hate you all the time. But when you come out and say shit like this on podcasts, after you've retired, it makes 100% of the people think water, wanker. What are you saying this for? Why are you? Why did you mean what you say in this thing of I'm not going to give a free kick for 17 minutes because I didn't have to? Like there was fouls in that 17 minutes and you did have to go and get closer to the action. Like when you should have been out of that center circle, you should have been closer to certain decisions or whatever. But it's my dean. It's the my dean, Conundrum is the most narcissistic block you'll ever meet. And it's no surprise that he's not in charge of the PG or MOL because with a guy with his experience, should be leading something like that. But he hasn't got the character to go into that rule, whereas Howard Webb, who somebody was a police man before he was a referee, obviously had that character to go and sort things out and get into it. Do you know what game might Dean did referee? Was it port with Manchester United in 2008? No, it was the FA Cup Final in 2008, though. Was it Cardiff Final? Cardiff had a goal this allowed for Hamburg, which I'm still not entirely sure what's a Hamburg to this day. So cheers, Mike. Appreciate your minigames on the 18th of May 2008. Well, all this for giving my ball is forgiven. That is it for today's football social daily. Some really strong get-and-see stuff there. And that is it for getting the C today. Our weekly feature now was a weekly feature on a Monday episode, we're giving it its own dedicated slot because it deserves it. And if you have any requests of what you want us to talk about on the podcast, get in touch with us via the social media channels, links are in the description, but that is it for another episode of FSD or speech on the next one. Bye for now.