🎙️ USA Soccercast •August 31, 2026 •⏱️ 26 min

#198 - What could a joint UEFA-Concacaf Nations League look like?

1. Executive Overview: Core Theses & Key Revelations

Episode #198 of USA Soccercast represents a watershed moment in contemporary football discourse. Rather than treating rumors of exploratory talks between UEFA and Concacaf as mere background noise in FIFA's tumultuous governance landscape, the broadcast converted a high-level administrative whisper into a rigorous, quantitative blueprint for global calendar reform. At its heart, the episode addresses a structural crisis in international football: the widening competitive gulf between confederations, the artificial ceiling imposed on North American development by regional isolation, and FIFA's relentless push to centralize commercial power through expanded tournaments and private equity capital.

The core thesis articulated throughout the episode is twofold. Geopolitically, a joint UEFA-Concacaf Nations League serves as a powerful counter-hegemonic alliance against FIFA's governing apparatus. By unifying 96 national associations across Europe, North America, Central America, and the Caribbean into a single integrated competition framework, UEFA and Concacaf could construct an independent broadcasting powerhouse capable of neutralizing Zurich's expansionist ambitions—most notably Gianni Infantino's FIFA Forward program and efforts to monetise international football through third-party investment funds. Competitively, the proposal addresses an existential requirement for the United States Men's National Team (USMNT) and Canada: escaping the regional echo chamber to secure regular, high-stakes competitive fixtures against elite European opposition on foreign soil.

The key revelations and structural models established during the episode offer a fascinating framework for international competition design:

  • The 96-Nation Matrix: Capitalizing on the mathematical alignment of 96 member associations (55 from UEFA, 41 from Concacaf), the proposal structures international football into six hierarchical leagues (Leagues A through F) of 16 teams each, complete with promotion and relegation dynamics.
  • The Competitive Exposure Imperative: Under a pure FIFA ranking distribution, League A becomes an elite crucible featuring 14 European powerhouses alongside Mexico and the United States. For the USMNT, placed in Pot 3, this model replaces low-margin friendlies with grueling road tests in European cathedrals—the exact environment required to build tactical maturity for World Cup knockout stages.
  • The Dual-Model Architecture: The host presents two distinct structural methodologies: a meritocratic "Pure Ranking Model" that prioritizes sporting integrity but marginalizes Concacaf representation in upper tiers, and an "Interleaved Deck-of-Cards Model" that forces a 50/50 confederation split across leagues to preserve regional representation.
  • The Women's Ecosystem Codification: On the women's side, a joint Nations League would formalize existing top-tier friendly scheduling for the United States Women's National Team (USWNT) and Canada into a structured, points-bearing championship, while establishing competitive ladders for emerging Latin American and Caribbean programs.
  • The CFU Strategic Reservoir: The episode delivers an emphatic reassessment of the Caribbean Football Union (CFU), characterizing its 31 member associations as global football's most dangerous latent force—a sub-confederation rich in untapped athletic talent, formidable home environments, and dual-national diaspora potential that traditional powerhouses underestimate at their own peril.

2. Context & Background: The Landscape Leading to This Conversation

To fully grasp the magnitude of the proposal analyzed in Episode #198, one must contextualize the evolutionary trajectory of international football over the past decade. Prior to 2018, the international match calendar outside of major continental tournaments was dominated by uncompetitive, friendlies. European powerhouses routinely played low-intensity matches that lacked broadcasting appeal, while smaller confederations struggled to secure quality opponents or financial solvency. UEFA disrupted this stagnant ecosystem in 2018 by launching the UEFA Nations League, effectively replacing empty friendly dates with a league structure tied to European Championship qualification.

Concacaf followed suit in 2019, introducing its own Nations League framework. As the USA Soccercast host noted, while UEFA pioneered the concept, Concacaf perfected its inclusive utility. By incorporating all 41 member associations—including non-FIFA sovereign territories such as Martinique, Guadeloupe, and French Guiana—Concacaf solved a chronic structural problem: small island nations remaining dormant for three out of every four years between World Cup qualifying cycles. The Concacaf Nations League guaranteed continuous competitive play, driving grassroots investment and national team activity across the Caribbean.

Concurrently, the global governance landscape entered a phase of intense political friction. Under President Gianni Infantino, FIFA embarked on an aggressive centralization strategy. Through the expansion of the FIFA World Cup to 48 teams, the creation of a massive 32-team Club World Cup, and proposals for biennial World Cups backed by private equity consortiums, Zurich sought to capture a larger share of global football's commercial revenues. This expansion directly threatened the financial dominance and calendar sovereignty of UEFA, as well as Concacaf's domestic growth trajectory.

It was against this backdrop of institutional friction that reports emerged of exploratory discussions between UEFA and Concacaf officials. Facing FIFA overreach, leadership in Nyon and Miami recognized their collective leverage. Together, UEFA and Concacaf represent the world's primary football media markets and broadcast rights capital. A joint Nations League proposal—whether fully implemented or used as strategic signaling—represents a formidable declaration of calendar autonomy, signaling to Zurich that the confederations possess the structural capability to build their own global super-tournament.

3. Deep-Dive Thematic Breakdown

3.1 Mathematical Architecture: Structuring the 96-Nation Pyramid

The technical core of the USA Soccercast proposal rests on the mathematical harmony of combining UEFA's 55 member associations with Concacaf's 41 member associations. The resulting total of 96 national teams divides cleanly by 16, allowing for a balanced, six-tiered pyramidal structure comprising Leagues A, B, C, D, E, and F.

The host details three primary allocation methodologies to populate these six leagues, each carrying profound trade-offs between sporting integrity, commercial viability, and confederation equity:

Model 1: The Pure FIFA Ranking Allocation (Sporting Meritocracy)

Under the Pure Ranking model, all 96 nations are ranked sequentially based on global FIFA coefficients, then segmented into six 16-team leagues. Under current rankings, League A would represent an unprecedented concentration of international football power:

Seeding Pot Nations (Global Ranking) Confederation Breakdown
Pot 1 Spain (1), France (2), England (4), Portugal (7) 4 UEFA / 0 Concacaf
Pot 2 Belgium (8), Netherlands (9), Mexico (10), Germany (12) 3 UEFA / 1 Concacaf
Pot 3 Croatia (13), Switzerland (14), Italy (15), USA (16) 3 UEFA / 1 Concacaf
Pot 4 Norway (19), Denmark (21), Austria (23), Turkey (27) 4 UEFA / 0 Concacaf

While League A under this model guarantees elite competition, it highlights a stark structural imbalance: 14 UEFA nations against just two Concacaf nations (USA and Mexico). Canada, despite its recent ascension, falls just outside the threshold at #17, becoming the top seed in League B alongside European sides such as Ukraine, Poland, Wales, Serbia, and Greece. The lower tiers reflect this imbalance in reverse: League B contains 13 UEFA and 3 Concacaf teams; League C contains 12 UEFA and 4 Concacaf teams; League D contains 10 UEFA and 6 Concacaf teams; while Leagues E and F are overwhelmingly populated by Concacaf member associations.

Model 2: The Interleaved "Deck of Cards" Model (Confederation Parity)

To address the European over-representation in League A, the host proposes an alternative "shuffle" methodology. This model merges the top 16 teams from UEFA Nations League A with the top 16 teams from Concacaf Nations League A, forcing an equal 8-8 split across upper leagues. Under this structure, Concacaf sides like Panama, Costa Rica, Jamaica, Honduras, Haiti, and Curacao are elevated into League A or B fixtures against European opposition. However, this approach risks creating severe competitive disparities, placing nations ranked outside the global top 100 (such as El Salvador at #100 or Dominican Republic at #144) directly against world-class European sides.

Model 3: The Inter-Confederation Challenge Showcase (ACC/SEC Model)

Recognizing the friction of full pyramidal integration, the host introduces a third hybrid concept modeled after American collegiate basketball challenges (such as the former ACC/Big Ten Challenge). Rather than a fully integrated league with promotion and relegation, UEFA League A (16 teams) and Concacaf League A (16 teams) would participate in a scheduled head-to-head showcase window. Eight matches would take place on European soil and eight on North American soil, generating marquee broadcast inventory while insulating smaller federations from structural relegation.

3.2 The USMNT Dilemma: Iron Sharpens Iron on Foreign Soil

For the United States Men's National Team, the proposal offers a solution to a chronic tactical deficiency: the lack of hostile foreign road tests against world-class opposition between World Cup cycles. In the current Concacaf ecosystem, the USMNT plays a heavy majority of its fixtures on domestic soil. Concacaf Gold Cups and Nations League Finals are hosted exclusively in North American NFL stadiums, providing comfortable environments that insulate players from true international adversity.

The host highlights a fundamental truth of international development: progress requires exposure to teams in the FIFA top 10—the sides the USMNT must defeat to reach a World Cup semifinal or final. Under the Pure Ranking model in League A, the USMNT (placed in Pot 3) would be drawn into a four-team group requiring home-and-away fixtures against elite European opponents. A hypothetical group pairing the United States with Spain (Pot 1), Germany (Pot 2), and Turkey (Pot 4) would force US Soccer to travel to Madrid, Dortmund, and Istanbul.

Tactically, these away fixtures would expose the USMNT to game states rarely encountered in Concacaf. Rather than breaking down low-block defenses in home matches, American players would be forced to master mid-block compact positioning, defensive transition management, and pressure evasion under elite press structures. Learning to navigate hostile atmospheric pressure in European stadiums is precisely the psychological conditioning needed to build tournament resilience.

3.3 The Women's Ecosystem: Codification, Disparity, and Structural Growth

The hypothetical extension of a joint Nations League to women's football presents a distinct set of operational and developmental dynamics. Unlike their male counterparts, the United States Women's National Team (USWNT) already prioritizes elite scheduling, regularly arranging friendly series against European heavyweights such as Spain, Germany, England, and France. However, a joint Nations League would transform these friendlies into a codified, competitive championship with points-bearing stakes and formal trophy incentive structures.

Applying the Pure Ranking model to the women's game highlights an even sharper confederation divide than on the men's side:

Tier UEFA Representation Concacaf Representation Key Concacaf Nations Included
League A 14 Nations 2 Nations USA (#2), Canada (#9)
League B 12 Nations 4 Nations Mexico, Jamaica, Costa Rica, Haiti
League C 11 Nations 5 Nations Panama, Puerto Rico, El Salvador, Trinidad & Tobago, Guatemala

While the USWNT and Canada comfortably inhabit League A alongside European elite, second-tier Concacaf programs like Mexico, Jamaica, Costa Rica, and Haiti would anchor League B. For these developing programs, regular competitive fixtures against mid-tier European sides (such as Wales, Scotland, Serbia, and Czechia) represent a massive step forward, providing structured international calendar windows that compel national federations to maintain continuous investment in their women's senior squads.

Furthermore, the host points to the transformative potential of a 96-team structure for lower-tier women's nations. In the current global paradigm, non-active member associations—such as Montserrat, which has historically lacked active women's senior match records—and low-ranked island federations (Anguilla, British Virgin Islands, Bahamas) suffer from years of inactivity between qualifying tournaments. A joint Nations League structure guarantees scheduled competitive fixtures, enabling smaller federations to climb FIFA rankings rapidly past idle AFC or CAF nations, thereby securing favorable seeding in future World Cup qualifiers.

3.4 The CFU Paradigm: The Sleeping Giant of Global Football

One of the most compelling editorial contributions of Episode #198 is the host's passionate analytical focus on the Caribbean Football Union (CFU). Comprising 31 member associations within Concacaf, the CFU represents a unique demographic and athletic sub-confederation that global football analytics often overlooks.

"The Caribbean Football Union is the greatest sub-confederation on the planet, and I think the most powerful and the most dangerous, because the world does not want them to get their act together."

This assessment is rooted in structural reality. The CFU possesses vast latent potential driven by three primary vectors:

  1. Diaspora Recruitment & Heritage Pipelines: Caribbean nations are increasingly tapping into European diaspora networks, integrating players developed in elite English Premier League, French Ligue 1, and Dutch Eredivisie academies. Nations like Jamaica, Suriname, Curacao, and Haiti have transformed their squad depth by recruiting high-grade professional talent.
  2. Formidable Home Fortresses: Venue dynamics in the Caribbean present some of the most intimidating physical environments in international sport. Traveling to Kingston's National Stadium ("The Office"), Trinidad's Hazley Crawford Stadium, or venues in San Jose and San Pedro Sula requires visiting teams to contend with intense heat, pitch friction, and intense crowd energy.
  3. The Tournament "Quest Ender" Persona: While individual CFU nations may lack the infrastructure depth required to win a 64-team World Cup, their high physical ceilings and tactical unpredictability render them lethal opponents in single-elimination or group settings. As the host notes, these sides possess the capability to end the World Cup ambitions of traditional powers.

A joint UEFA-Concacaf Nations League would expose European sides to these unique competitive environments. The host highlights potential cross-confederation matchups—such as North Macedonia traveling to Paramaribo to face Suriname, or Cyprus hosting Belize—as transformative fixtures that would expand the tactical horizons of both confederations.

3.5 Feasibility, Logistics, and Calendar Friction

Despite the strategic appeal of a joint Nations League, the host candidly acknowledges the immense logistical and administrative barriers that render full implementation improbable in the near term. The primary friction points center on operational constraints:

  • Transatlantic Travel & Recovery: Coordinating intercontinental travel within standard 9-day FIFA international windows poses extreme recovery challenges. A European team traveling to Mexico City or Kingston before returning to Europe for a mid-week match faces 10-to-15-hour flight legs and 6-to-8-hour time zone shifts, generating sharp pushback from European club managers and FIFPRO player unions.
  • Broadcast Rights Amalgamation: UEFA's centralized marketing agency (CAA Eleven) operates under sophisticated, long-term media contracts across European territories. Merging these premium rights with Concacaf's commercial apparatus would require complex revenue-sharing formulas and rights renegotiations across dozens of global broadcast territories.
  • FIFA Calendar Veto Power: Any official inter-confederation tournament requires regulatory placement within the FIFA International Match Calendar. Zurich holds ultimate authority over window designations and would view a formal UEFA-Concacaf merger as an existential threat to its own revenue-generating properties.

4. Speaker Perspectives & Analytical Contrast

Evaluating the analytical stance of the USA Soccercast host reveals a perspective characterized by pragmatic idealism. The host combines a deep commitment to North American football development with a clear-eyed understanding of international football politics. Throughout the episode, several distinct analytical positions emerge:

Analytical Focus Host's Core Position Editorial & Tactical Assessment
Concacaf Governance "UEFA started Nations League, Concacaf perfected it." Accurately highlights Concacaf's achievement in integrating non-FIFA island nations, though downplays the extreme competitive disparities present in lower-tier groups.
USMNT Development Urgent need for foreign road tests against top-10 teams. Tactically sound thesis; identifies home-soil over-exposure as a key factor limiting USMNT tactical resilience in major tournament knockout rounds.
CFU Potential CFU is global football's most dangerous sub-confederation. Spotlights under-analyzed diaspora recruitment trends, though somewhat romanticizes venue advantages while brushing past systemic administrative challenges.
Feasibility Realism "I don't think it actually will [happen]." Demonstrates administrative realism; recognizes that logistical gridlock and FIFA opposition make full implementation unlikely despite its strategic merit.

The host's argument displays an interesting tension between sporting meritocracy and regional equality. While advocating for the Pure Ranking model to guarantee the USMNT elite fixtures, the host acknowledges that such a model leaves Concacaf severely under-represented in League A. This admission leads to the proposal of the "Deck of Cards" shuffle and ACC/SEC challenge formats—solutions that prioritize regional balance over raw FIFA ranking coefficients.

5. Strategic & Industry Implications

The broader implications of a potential UEFA-Concacaf alliance extend far beyond scheduling mechanics, threatening to alter the balance of power within sports business and global media rights:

1. Neutralizing FIFA's Commercial Monopoly: A unified UEFA-Concacaf broadcast package would control over 65% of the global football media valuation landscape. By bundling European powerhouses (Spain, France, England, Germany) with major North American consumer markets (USA, Mexico, Canada), the two confederations could command broadcast rights fees rivaling the FIFA World Cup itself. This leverage effectively limits FIFA's ability to impose unapproved tournament expansions on the international calendar.

2. Global Talent Discovery & Transfer Market Inflation: Direct, official competition between Concacaf nations and UEFA sides would dramatically accelerate scouting pipelines. Young talent across the Caribbean and Central America—frequently overlooked due to the perceived weakness of regional competition—would gain direct exposure against European defenders. A standout performance by a CFU international against a UEFA League A or B opponent would directly de-risk transfer investments for European clubs.

3. Workload Escalation and Club-Country Conflict: Adding high-intensity transatlantic fixtures to an already overloaded calendar would deepen the rift between national federations and elite European clubs. Organizations like the European Club Association (ECA) are actively campaigning to reduce international match loads. Replacing regional fixtures with transatlantic travel would inevitably trigger legal challenges regarding player release obligations under FIFA Annex 1 regulations.

6. Looking Ahead: Unresolved Questions & Next Milestones

As the international football community navigates the post-2026 World Cup cycle, several key indicators will determine whether the transatlantic blueprint discussed in Episode #198 remains a theoretical exercise or evolves into active policy:

  • The 2026–2030 International Match Calendar Negotiations: The immediate benchmark is FIFA's upcoming calendar ratification. Observers must monitor whether UEFA and Concacaf push for designated "inter-confederation window blocks" that grant confederations autonomy to organize joint challenge series.
  • Evolution of the FIFA Series: FIFA has already attempted to counter regional isolation by launching the "FIFA Series"—a pilot program funding cross-confederation friendlies for lower-ranked nations during March windows. The success or failure of this initiative will indicate whether confederations prefer centralized FIFA management or independent joint ventures.
  • CFU Governance & Professionalization Metrics: The realization of the Caribbean's latent potential hinges on structural reform within the CFU. Key metrics include the expansion of domestic professional leagues (such as the Jamaican Premier League and Trinidad's TTPFL), stadium infrastructure upgrades to meet FIFA Category 4 standards, and formalized diaspora recruitment pipelines.
  • Implementation of Hybrid Challenge Models: While a full 96-team pyramidal merger faces formidable operational hurdles, a scaled-down 16-match "UEFA-Concacaf Challenge" window remains highly achievable. Demonstrating the broadcast success of a pilot showcase could serve as the catalyst for broader competition integration in the decade ahead.

💬 Key Quotes & Speaker Breakdown

UEFA-Concacaf Nations League

"There was this proposal and discussions and reports about Concacaf and UEFA meeting to form a new Nations League that would kind of rival the World Cup."

— Host

"If this were to happen, we would have 96 teams in this joint Nations League, 96, almost half of the world involved in this joint tournament."

— Host

"It would take a lot of logistics for a joint UEFA-Concacaf Nations League to come together. And I don't think it actually will."

— Host

USMNT development

"The United States needs to test themselves as often as possible against the best teams in the world, not just the 15s and the 20s, but the top 10, the teams that they know they need to beat if they're to win a World Cup."

— Host

Caribbean football

"The Caribbean Football Union is the greatest sub-confederation on the planet, and I think the most powerful and the most dangerous, because the world does not want them to get their act together."

— Host

USMNT scheduling

"US Soccer needs to have these teams go out on the road more because that's where they learn more about themselves. It shouldn't be just for World Cup qualifying."

— Host

International competition

"Those teams can be the teams that may not win World Cups, but they certainly will end your quest to win one."

— Host

Nations League format

"I say that UEFA started the Nations League, but Concacaf perfected it."

— Host

International rankings

"Canada is not one of the top 16 teams if you combine UEFA and Concacaf. They're number 17. They would be the top team in League B."

— Host
📜 View Full Episode Verbatim Transcript 21,593 characters
We'll bring you everything about the U.S. National teams, the players, the leagues, everything else that impacts Game of Soccer in the U.S. United States. We're going to do a fun activity on this episode because a couple of weeks ago, it gets about about a week and a half ago, they're in the midst of all of this back and forth with Johnny Emphantino and the FIFA forward project that he was trying to do to usurp control of the row cup and put it in the hands of private equity. There was this proposal, if you will, and in discussions and reports about cock-a-caf and UEFA meeting to form a new nation's league that would kind of rival the row cup. In a way, not necessarily replace it, but to have some sort of competition that would be a major competition between two confederations. It struck me because one, you all know how I feel about cock-a-caf nation's league. It's the greatest tournament because islands are involved. There's also UEFA nation's league, which kind of started this whole thing. I say that UEFA started nation's league, but cock-a-caf perfected it. The idea of the two confederations coming together in the midst of trying to get Infantino out of power to create a joint nation's league of some sort, I thought to myself, what would it look like? What could it look like if the word was given and these two confederations were to proceed with a joint nation's league in 2028-2029? Let's talk about it. We're going to talk about, on one half, we're going to talk about the men on the other side. The women. I think what we would focus on is how it would affect obviously the United States, both the men's national team and the women's national team, and whether this is a good idea for cock-a-caf and for UEFA, but let's focus on the fact that if this were to happen and we're doing hypotheticals for this whole episode, if this was supposed to happen, then we would have 96 teams in this joint nation's league, 96, almost half of the world involved in this joint tournament. Obviously, you would have multiple two of leagues, and if you broke it down, the great thing is 96 is a number that is divisible by 16, so you can have six leagues of 16 teams in each of this, and I'll talk about the women on the other side because there's one that we have to look out for. But 96 teams divided into league A, league B, league C, D, E, and F. I think that's first of all that setting itself up to be great, and to have that kind of table and have the promotional delegation between the two, between the six leagues would be awesome, but the question would remain is how do you shape these leagues? Well, the first thing you could do, and maybe the easiest thing to do, at least for the first nation's league, is to divide all the leagues up, rank everybody and take their current FIFA rankings, and rank them one to 96 essentially, divide by 16, and you take those 16 teams and go to league A, B, C, D, E, and F. So what would that look like if that was the case? If they decided to just go off FIFA ranking and ranked everyone for the top ranked team to the lowest ranked team, in the case of Coca-Caf, the non FIFA countries that are in Coca-Caf, they're not rated obviously in the FIFA rankings. So the way that would be set up is league A would be the top 16 teams between the two confederations. And thankfully, the United States national team would be in league A under that scenario. You'd have Spain, France, England, Portugal, Belgium, Netherlands, Mexico, Germany, Croatia, Switzerland, Italy, USA, Norway, Denmark, Austria, and Turkey. Now for the United States national team, that would be incredible to be able to be a part of a competition that had their facing essentially top 10, top 15 teams. In that group, seven of the current top 10 in the FIFA rankings are there, 13 of the top 20 and 16 of the top 27. That's really, really good and that's great competition and would, you know, answer the call for so many people to say, hey, the United States needs to be test themselves as often as possible against the best teams in the world, not just like the 15s and the 20s, but the top 10, the teams that they know they need to beat if they're to win a world cup. And the way that it would be divided, if you have pots, obviously, the US at 16th in the world would be in pot three in this league A because you have Spain, France, England, Portugal, that's one, three, four and seven in the world. That's pot A Belgium, Netherlands, Mexico, Germany, eight, nine, 10 and 12. That's pot two, USA, we have Croatia, Switzerland, Italy, USA, 13, 14, 15 to 16th in the world. That's pot three and then Norway at 19, Denmark at 21, Austria, 23 and Turkey at 27. There is your pot four and from there, you could divide and run any list of scenarios again in your group, you can have a Spain or a France, you can have a Netherlands or Belgium in pot out of pot two, you have a Germany out of pot two. The obviously wouldn't be able to face anyone in pot three that'd be courageous Switzerland and Italy, but then you can have a Norway or Denmark or Turkey again in your group to round out your group. And that would be incredible to test for, incredible test for the United Statesman's national team. And I think one that a lot of people would welcome, you also would get to travel to some of these countries which would be amazing. And I think the United States, in general, US soccer needs to have these teams go out on the road more because that's where they learn more about themselves. And it shouldn't be just for real qualifying and for nations when they're required to, they should try to schedule friendly against teams in on the road because that's where they're going to shape how they outlast everyone in work of qualifying and in world cups that aren't on American soil. So that would be a great thing. And again, to do that in the homes of some of these really good teams I think would be great. But I think the problem with it is, is that in league A, if you just do the rankings, the current fee for rankings, of the 16 teams in league A, only Mexico and the United States are from cock a calf. You even go down to league B, 13 UEFA teams, three cock a calf teams, league C, 12 UEFA teams, four cock a calf teams, league D, 10 UEFA teams, and six cock a calf teams. You have to go all the way to league E to find a league that had more cock a calf teams than UEFA teams. And obviously, if you're going to do a joint, you're a joint nation's league, you'd probably want some balance. So maybe you kind of take the current league A of UEFA, the current league A of cock a calf, and you just kind of do like a deck of cards, put them in the middle, fold them, shuffle them, and then see what spits out. Eight teams from cock a calf, eight teams from UEFA, and you kind of do that as far as you can until you get to leagues E and F where you might have to do some finagling with that. But if you do the current nations league for UEFA, league A, there's only a few changes. Spain, France, England, Portugal, Belgium, Germany, Croatia, Italy, Norway, Denmark, Turkey, Wales, Serbia, Czechia, and Greece. So those last four teams are really what's changing here. And for cock a calf, if you look at league A, all 16 teams, Mexico, the United States, Canada, and Panama, of course, are having a buy through the group stage that's starting in September. But then you have Costa Rica, Honduras, Jamaica, Curacao, Haiti, Martinique, the Lone, not ranked or non FIFA team, Guatemala, El Salvador, Trinidad and Tobago, Suriname, Nicaragua, and Dominican Republic. That would be interesting. And Dominican Republic at 144th in the world, Nicaragua at 131st, Suriname at 125th, Trinidad and Tobago at 102nd, El Salvador at 100th, they're all in the league A. And then you also have Martinique who is not ranked because they're not a FIFA member. So do they divide it that way or do they just go with the strength and say, Hey, if cock a calf wants to get into league A, they got to earn it through promotion and relegation, take the top teams, organize them, and let's go. But so for cock a calf as a whole, it might be weird to try and make this work, where they're getting their teams into as high a league as possible. But they still get the benefit of these tests. Canada is not one of the top 16 teams if you combine UEFA and cock a calf. They're number 17. They would be the top team in league B, but they would get to face a Ukraine, Russia, if they if they ever got unbanned, Poland, Switzerland, Wales, Hungary, Serbia, Slovakia, Greece, Chechiia, Romania, Ireland, those are teams that they could play and those are really decent teams. Panama and Costa Rica will also be in that mix for league B league C. You have like teams like Bosnia, Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Northern Ireland, Iceland, Finland, Montenegro, Bulgaria, those are teams like Honduras and Jamaica, they get to face each other. And I think that'd be really, really interesting. And I think for cock a calf, they would get the better benefit of this because in every scenario, they're facing teams that are better than in UEFA or at least at the very least ranked higher. And for the United States, scrolling back up to the A, there's a lot of opportunity here to get better and to test themselves against the best teams on the planet, at least some of them, to show, hey, when the next World Cup comes around in 2030, sign us up as a contender because we're not going to be afraid of facing an England or a Portugal. We're going to know what to do next time against Belgium to come out with the result. Germany and Croatia are going to come in and we're going to say great, that's awesome. Hope you had a great trip. Here's your loss. Like those are the things that they are aiming for. And I wonder if it was all just, you know, a lot of smoke, but it's really interesting if they were able to do something like this. And it doesn't have to be a full-fledged competition all up and down, but maybe even setting up a series of friendly similar to what FIFA does with lower ranked teams to try and get them in this, you know, get some of these teams in, could competition with each other. Think of it kind of like this. Think of it kind of like the ACC, SEC challenge in basketball or the former ACC Big 10 challenge where UEFA could say here's our 16 teams. Coca-Cola can say here's our 16 and you just line them up. Who's facing who? Eight of them are in UEFA territory, eight of them in Coca-Cola territory. You might see the United States travel to Switzerland to face Switzerland, but you might see Jamaica hosts Bosnia at the office. That could be really intriguing and I wonder what comes of this and it'd be fun to see that on the men's side. We're going to take a quick break because on the other side, we're going to talk about this, but we're going to talk about it from the women's perspective. Just as intriguing in the women's side, so stick around. Hey everyone, are you looking for the latest gear for your US national teams? Major League Soccer, the NGBSL, or any other team in the world soccer? The USA Soccer cast has affiliate partnerships that are ready to help you out. Head to linktree.com. Slash USA Soccer cast where we have links to homage, fanatics, to Emma's store, and breaking feet. You can get the jersey, shirt, hat, or accessory you're looking for to support your team while also saving some money and helping this show in the process. Again, linktree.com. Slash USA Soccer Cast. Click on the links and get your gear. And we thank you as always for your support of the show. We're back and we're continuing this hypothetical discussion about what a joint UEFA ConquerCalf Nation's League would look like and how it could help the United States. We shift to the women because of course the women are a little different in how they're set up, but funny enough, the way that these leagues would be comprised is similar. If you look at league A again, if you take the women's FIFA rankings right now, and you took all those teams from number one Spain all the way down to the not ranked teams, here's how league A could shape up if he came to fruition. If Spain, the United States at number two, Germany at number three, England number four, Francis six, Sweden eight, Canada at nine, Netherlands 10 in the world. And then you also have Denmark, Italy, Norway, Iceland, Belgium, Ireland, Portugal and Austria. Now of those 16 teams, all of them are in the top 23 in the world. Eight of them in the top 10, 13 in the top 20. That's awesome. And the United States on the women's side, they usually test themselves against teams of that magnitude in the top 20 top 10 in the world. They're not usually playing teams in the hundreds, except when they have to in ConquerCalf competitions. For the most part, they're trying to schedule friendlies against a Spain like we're going to have in October against the Germany against the England against Canada against Netherlands. They try to schedule these type of friendlies. Most of them are here in the United States, but they're at least scheduling the best teams they can every single time. And they're playing them multiple times in a window so that they can get those reps. So this would be at least in the women's side, it wouldn't be a departure from what they're normally doing, which I think is great. But it would maybe codify it, I guess organize it a little bit better. And if you even take my proposal or my idea before the break about having like an ACC SEC style challenge, that's where this could get lopsided on the women's side. Because there's not a lot of women's teams in ConquerCalf that are doing what would be required to go up against some of these top teams. It would be a little bit more of a challenge, right? Again, in league A, you have 14 you way for teams and two ConquerCalf teams if you just took them straight ranking style. The United States and Canada both in the top 10. But in USA at number two, but they're the only two ConquerCalf teams in that 16 team league A, this proverbial league A in league B, you have four ConquerCalf teams. You have Mexico, Jamaica, Costa Rica, and Haiti. And I think those teams are teams that are on the cusp. They want to announce themselves by getting to the women's world cup and then being able to play their way into later rounds and show that they have improved as squads. If you go down to league C in this scenario, 11 UEFA and five are from ConquerCalf. The five from ConquerCalf, Panama, Puerto Rico, El Salvador, Trinidad, Tobago, and Guatemala. They're growing up against teams like Northern Ireland, Belarus if they got their, got unbanned, Romania, Slovakia, Greece, Croatia, those type of teams in the 50s and 60s. So this would be a start challenge for the women. But I think going back to the US women, I think the great thing is they faced all these teams before. If you think about the last but four years, going back to the 2023 World Cup, they face Spain many times and they're going to face them twice more. They face Germany several times. They face England several times. They face France a couple of times. Sweden, they've played Canada, they've played many times. The Dutch, they've played Italy, Iceland, Ireland, Portugal. They've faced almost all these teams. And for them, it would just be business as usual. But to maybe put some skin in the game and have groups and have it where they can play for a title, that would help them out. And it's not necessarily what helped their ranking like it would on the men's side by getting those tournament points. But at least for the United States, they would be testing themselves every single time out against somebody. And I think for some of the other teams, they would get their chance to play the United States in play Spain and play Germany in England, those top four teams, which I think is pretty cool. I mentioned that the women's brackets would look a little different from the men. And the reason why I say that is you got to scroll all the way down to League F. As I mentioned, there are 96 countries in Coca-Caf and UEFA combined. 55 for UEFA, 31 for Coca-Caf. And so that splits evenly into 16 groups or six leagues of 16 teams. On the women's side, though, there is one team that has never played a match. They technically have formed, technically formed 20, 30 years ago. But Montserrat has never played a match. And I think the one thing about nation's league that has helped on the men's side is to rejuvenate, revitalize or otherwise create national teams for some of these nations that never play. The only time they would lace them up would be for those one or two World Cup qualifiers at the very beginning. And then they would go dormant for four years. Nation's league kept them active and kept them investing into their teams and kept them, you know, searching for talent and developing that talent and putting them out in the field and getting them games where they can get better. This part of the joint nation's league would be incredibly important for teams like Sam Reno, who is who plays, but it's so bad they're not ranked. British Virgin Islands, once again, not ranked because they're that bad and they haven't played in a long time. Teams like, again, Anguilla in the Bahamas that came in islands, it feels like if they can get their act together and start playing some games, you can rise up from the bottom of the women's rankings. A lot faster than you can on the men's side. Because again, between you, there are some teams that aren't playing a lot of games. And so they're not getting the points necessary to move up or down. And so if you start playing consistently, which this nation's league would do, then those African teams and Asian teams that aren't playing that many games, you will rise up over them very quickly. And going from 196 to 150 isn't a, you know, is not going to turn heads at FIFA's headquarters and go, oh, wow, this is a nice change for going, but for those teams, it means that they enter World Cup qualifying a little bit later, that they get to play some better teams if they were in a nation's league format, which again allows them to get better. You get to play on the field and get the results and get the promotional relegation that they desire. But I think it would be interesting to have a nation's league a full-fledged one on the women's side in ConquerCalf, but also this joint one would be fascinating because I think some of these teams would not match up well against each other. I would love to see a North Macedonia travel to Suriname in Leegi. That would be amazing. Cyprus, hosting, Belize, Latvia, going to Cuba. Like this would be fascinating. Cuba would probably not play in Cuba, but the point remains that you get to see some of these matchups that you had never seen before. And I think that would be so, so interesting to do. But I also think ConquerCalf, the reason why I think nation's league is so important is that these island countries, the Caribbean football union, which is the greatest sub-confederation on the planet, and I think the most powerful and the most dangerous, because the world does not want them to get their act together. The world does not want to see them get better because they have untapped talent and untapped resources. And if they are able to invest it correctly and put it in and not have outside interference and put it in the right places, those teams can be the teams that may not win World Cups, but they certainly will end your quest to win one. I think that is where they can ruffle some feathers and it really make a difference in how qualifying goes, not just in ConquerCalf, but how some of these tournaments might go around the world because you don't want to see Jamaica at the office. You don't want to see Costa Rica at home. You don't want to see El Salvador, I'm sorry, train to add Tobago at Hazley Crawford, if they get to the point where they are able to host games like that. Entirely fascinating to me, I think it would be a fantastic idea. It would take a lot of logistics for a joint UEFA ConquerCalf nation's league to come together. And I don't think it actually will. But this hypothetical was really fun. So I thank you for indulging me and allowing me to do this. This is what these type of games, these tournaments could be about getting ConquerCalf better for us on the men's side, especially getting better competition to allow them to develop and show that they can improve against the top 10-5 teams in the world. And on the women's side, once again, being able to test themselves every single time out, which is what they tend to do between World Cups. That would do it for episode 198 of the USA Soccer Cast. Thank you for listening. Remember, you can find us on Blue Sky, Twitter, and YouTube. Follow us on all of those sites at USA Soccer Cast. Subscribe, rate, and review our shows. It helps us get in front of new people and it's greatly appreciated. Tell your friends about us and then finally head to linktree.com slash who is a soccer cast to check out our affiliate links and our stimulus store. We have everything you need to watch Beautiful Game and follow your teams and using those links also help support the show. We'll talk to you again soon, y'all. Peace.