🎙️ Futbol Americas (ESPN) •August 7, 2026 •⏱️ 1h 23m

Futbol Americas: Poch extends with USMNT+Americans on the move this summer+Larry Berg new MLS commissioner+Messi back with a brace+Leagues Cup action+Vini Jr staying in Madrid

1. Executive Overview: Core Theses & Key Revelations

The post-2026 North American soccer landscape was supposed to herald an era of quiet consolidation, structural assessment, and measured planning. Instead, US Soccer detonated a strategic bombshell by officially confirming a four-year contract extension for senior men’s national team head coach Mauricio Pochettino, binding the Argentine tactician through the 2030 FIFA World Cup. Following a 2026 World Cup campaign that culminated in a Round of 16 elimination at the hands of Belgium in Seattle, the federation’s decision to double down on Pochettino marks one of the most provocative governance gambles in modern international football. On the latest episode of ESPN’s Futbol Americas, analysts Ale Moreno, Herculez Gomez, Mauricio Pedroza, and senior writer Jeff Carlisle engaged in an unsparing debate that peeled back the layers of this high-stakes institutional maneuver.

The broadcast established four central narrative pillars that now define the trajectory of the United States Men’s National Team (USMNT):

  • Institutional Asymmetry and Executive Surrender: US Soccer has effectively dismantled its traditional technical safeguards. Following the departure of Sporting Director Matt Crocker, Chief Executive Officer JT Batson opted against hiring a direct replacement, choosing instead to flatten the organization's sporting hierarchy. In doing so, the federation handed Pochettino unprecedented sovereign control over player pathways, youth national team structures (including the U20 and Olympic squads), and technical philosophy. As Ale Moreno forcefully argued, this reflects a federation acting out of desperation—needing the glamour and gravitas of Pochettino far more than the globally sought-after manager needs the federation.
  • The Flight Risk and European Flirtation: Despite the formal ink on a four-year commitment, the panel voiced deep skepticism regarding Pochettino’s long-term retention. Moreno offered a devastating assessment, declaring with absolute certainty that Pochettino will "jump ship" to return to elite European club football long before the 2030 World Cup arrives. The central anxiety confronting American soccer is that the federation has offered maximum financial leverage and structural authority without receiving any guarantee of reciprocal loyalty.
  • The Imminence of a Generational Rebuild: The 2026 World Cup squad has reached its athletic shelf life. With fifteen core players—including Christian Pulisic, Weston McKennie, and Tyler Adams—projected to cross the age-30 threshold during this upcoming cycle, Pochettino faces an immediate mandate to overhaul a roster that Carlisle described as having grown "stale." Yet this imperative collides directly with Pochettino’s ideological rigidity regarding dual-national recruitment, a policy Herculez Gomez characterized as a dangerous "zero tolerance" posture that the talent pool cannot afford.
  • Tactical Stagnation at the Top Tier: Beneath the surface of Pochettino’s 31-game record (17 wins, 12 losses, 2 draws) lies a troubling competitive ceiling. Over his initial 18-month tenure leading into the 2026 tournament, the USMNT failed to register a single victory against an opponent ranked higher than themselves in the FIFA World Rankings. The central sporting question remains unresolved: did Pochettino genuinely transform the team's internal culture, or did he merely re-package the same structural limitations that plagued his predecessors?

Beyond the national team apparatus, the episode illuminated a broader macro-ecosystem in flux. With Major League Soccer transitioning into the leadership era of new Commissioner Larry Berg following Don Garber’s long tenure, and Lionel Messi continuing to dominate the domestic narrative with multi-goal performances in the Leagues Cup, American soccer finds itself caught between the optics of commercial expansion and the stark realities of elite international performance.

2. Context & Background: The Landscape Leading to This Conversation

To fully comprehend the intense skepticism voiced on Futbol Americas, one must examine the specific conditions under which Mauricio Pochettino was initially hired and the exact return on investment US Soccer achieved during his first 18 months in charge. Arriving in late 2024 following the dismissal of Gregg Berhalter in the wake of a disastrous Copa América group-stage exit, Pochettino was presented as the elite savior—a manager with UEFA Champions League final pedigree capable of instilling big-club standards, tactical sophistication, and unyielding accountability into a gifted but complacent generation of players.

Pochettino’s initial remit was strictly focused on short-term optimization: navigate the 18-month ramp-up to the home 2026 FIFA World Cup, maximize the potential of the domestic tournament, and break through the historic glass ceiling of the knockout rounds. Over those 31 matches leading up to and through the 2026 tournament, Pochettino managed a record of 17 wins, 12 losses, and 2 draws. While the raw win percentage offered palatable soundbites for federation executives, a granular analysis of those fixtures revealed an uncomfortable truth: the team routinely defeated lesser CONCACAF opposition and mid-tier friendly opponents, but repeatedly faltered when matched against tactical heavyweights from Europe and South America.

  • Overall Record
  • 31 Matches: 17W - 12L - 2D
  • 54.8% win rate; heavily padded by domestic CONCACAF fixtures and home friendlies.
  • Record vs. Top-Ranked Teams
  • 0 Wins in 31 Matches
  • Failed to secure a single signature victory against teams ranked above USMNT in FIFA rankings.
  • 2026 World Cup Result
  • Round of 16 Elimination (vs. Belgium, Seattle)
  • Mirrored the exact structural finish of the 2022 Qatar campaign under Gregg Berhalter.
  • Executive Governance Shift
  • Dissolution of Sporting Director Position
  • Matt Crocker's exit led CEO JT Batson to centralize technical authority under Pochettino.
  • Roster Demographics
  • 15 Squad Players Crossing Age 30
  • Immediate necessity to integrate U20/U23 talent before the 2030 cycle.
    • Metric / Event Pochettino Era Baseline (2024–2026) Analytical Context & Impact

    The 2026 World Cup itself proved to be a mirror image of prior cycles. The USMNT advanced from a manageable group stage featuring energetic, high-pressing displays that captured public enthusiasm, only to be systematically dismantled in the Round of 16 by Belgium in Seattle. The 2-1 defeat exposed recurring vulnerabilities: structural disorientation in mid-block defense, an over-reliance on individual brilliance from Christian Pulisic, and an inability to alter game states through tactical adjustments from the technical area. In essence, the team finished precisely where it had in Qatar four years earlier under Berhalter.

    What makes the subsequent four-year contract extension so astonishing—and contentious—is the timeline of executive decision-making. As reporting by ESPN senior writer Jeff Carlisle confirmed, US Soccer leadership had placed the four-year extension offer on the table prior to the commencement of the 2026 World Cup. Federation President Cindy Parlow Cone and CEO JT Batson did not evaluate Pochettino based on tournament output; rather, they preemptively committed the organization's financial and structural future to him before a single World Cup ball was kicked. When combined with the simultaneous departure of Sporting Director Matt Crocker, US Soccer effectively surrendered its administrative checks and balances, abandoning the dual-tier structure of technical director and head coach to establish a managerial monarchy centered entirely around Pochettino.

    3. Deep-Dive Thematic Breakdown

    3.1 The Architecture of Power: Dissolving the Sporting Director & The Managerial Monarchy

    The single most consequential revelation emerging from the Futbol Americas discussion is the radical restructuring of US Soccer’s sporting executive hierarchy. Historically, modern football federations operate under a separation of powers: a Sporting Director oversees long-term infrastructure, talent identification pathways, youth national team alignment, and coach education, while the National Team Head Coach focuses exclusively on senior squad logistics and match preparation. With Matt Crocker’s departure, CEO JT Batson made the deliberate calculation not to recruit a replacement, creating a flattened administrative model where executive vice president Oguchi Onyewu and board leadership handle corporate oversight, leaving Pochettino as the undisputed dictator of technical operations.

    3.1.1 The Flatter Hierarchy and the Vacuum of Expertise

    This organizational pivot places immense administrative weight on a single individual. As Jeff Carlisle noted during the broadcast, US Soccer’s leadership candidly acknowledged their own internal limitations: within the high-altitude corporate chambers of the federation, nobody possesses greater footballing expertise than Mauricio Pochettino. Consequently, Pochettino’s new mandate extends far beyond selecting 23 players for international windows. He is now charged with overseeing the player pathway, restructuring the U20 national team apparatus, dictating the tactical curriculum for the Olympic squad, and mentoring domestic coaching structures.

    However, this consolidation creates a dangerous structural vulnerability. International head coaches are inherently consumed by short-term survival; their job security rests entirely on window-to-window senior results. Expecting a high-profile manager to simultaneously dedicate meaningful energy to grassroots development, scouting regional academies, and coordinating youth national team camps is an organizational fallacy. If senior results deteriorate, youth infrastructure is invariably neglected. By dissolving the Sporting Director role, US Soccer eliminated the institutional advocate tasked with protecting the federation’s twenty-year development plan from the immediate whims of the senior manager.

    3.1.2 Financial Leverage and Institutional Subservience

    Ale Moreno launched a scathing critique against this executive posture, defining it as a complete surrender of institutional self-respect. In Moreno’s estimation, US Soccer approached negotiations not as a sovereign, self-confident governing body, but as a supplicant desperate to retain celebrity star power. By granting Pochettino absolute authority and an eye-watering compensation package—negotiated by his high-powered agency representation—the federation signaled that it lacks faith in its own domestic system.

    "It concerns me watching from the outside that I get the sense that the United States Soccer Federation seemed to need Mauricio Pochettino a whole lot more than Mauricio Pochettino needs the US Soccer Federation. It's a desperate plea... At some point, you have to be a soccer federation and behave like a soccer federation."
    — Ale Moreno, ESPN Futbol Americas

    This imbalance of power fundamentally alters the dynamic of accountability. When a federation signals that a manager is indispensable, it forfeits its ability to conduct rigorous, objective performance evaluations. If Pochettino operates with total immunity, knowing that leadership cannot afford the political embarrassment of his departure, the benchmark for tactical success is inevitably lowered.

    3.2 The Glass Ceiling: 31 Games, Zero Elite Scalps, and Tactical Inertia

    A central pillar of the debate centered on whether Mauricio Pochettino has actually improved the USMNT’s competitive ceiling or simply maintained a polished illusion of progress. Over his initial 31 matches in charge, Pochettino compiled a record that looks convincing in promotional material but dissolves under rigorous tactical scrutiny.

    3.2.1 Measuring the Process Beyond Matchday Results

    The statistical indictment presented by Ale Moreno is damning: across 31 fixtures, Pochettino’s USMNT failed to log a single victory over a team ranked higher than them in the official FIFA World Rankings. In modern international analytics, process is measured by a team’s capacity to solve complex tactical problems against superior opposition—breaking down low blocks, executing press-resistance under elite spatial constriction, and sustaining defensive compactness over 90 minutes against world-class attacking units.

    Under Pochettino, the USMNT showed flashes of modern positional play during home friendlies and group-stage encounters against lower-tier sides. However, when confronted with top-tier opposition, the team habitually reverted to reactive patterns. The Round of 16 defeat to Belgium served as a definitive case study: despite possessing comparable athletic metrics, the USMNT was tactically outmaneuvered in central midfield, unable to progress the ball through Belgium’s mid-block press and hopelessly exposed in defensive transitions. The result proved that 18 months of Pochettino’s coaching had not altered the fundamental competitive reality of the program.

    3.2.2 The Myth of Cultural Transformation

    In his post-extension comments, Pochettino repeatedly emphasized the concept of "culture," asserting that his first 18 months were spent laying foundational mindsets that could not be fully realized due to time constraints. He framed the upcoming four-year cycle as a "fresh start"—a clean slate free from inherited structures.

    However, the Futbol Americas panel expressed deep skepticism regarding this rhetorical defense. Mauricio Pedroza and Ale Moreno questioned whether "culture" has become a convenient umbrella term used to mask tactical inertia. Culture in elite football is reflected in standard of execution, positional discipline, and competitive resilience against elite opposition. If a team remains incapable of beating higher-ranked nations after 31 matches, asserting that the "culture has shifted" is an unprovable abstraction. The panel highlighted the contradiction of declaring a "fresh start" for a manager who has already been in command for nearly two years, noting that resetting expectations buys the coaching staff time while insulating them from immediate scrutiny.

    3.3 The Generational Cliff: Roster Renewal & The Dual-National Recruiting Crisis

    As Pochettino embarks on this extended tenure, his most urgent technical challenge is managing an impending demographic crisis. The core player pool that carried the national team through both the 2022 and 2026 World Cup cycles is entering athletic decline, forcing an immediate and comprehensive roster evolution.

    3.3.1 The Aging Golden Generation

    Jeff Carlisle emphasized that a primary motivation behind Pochettino’s retention was the urgent need to break up a squad that had grown comfortable and stale. The core group—anchored by Christian Pulisic, Weston McKennie, Tyler Adams, Antonee Robinson, and Tim Weah—will see 15 key squad members transition into their 30s before the 2030 World Cup in Spain, Portugal, and Morocco. Relying on an aging core in international football is a proven recipe for failure, as physical decline inevitably compromises high-intensity pressing systems like Pochettino’s signature double-pivot press.

    Pochettino’s directive is to aggressively audition and integrate the next generation of American talent. Emerging prospects—such as dynamic young players securing moves to Premier League setups like Crystal Palace (e.g., Gozo)—must be introduced early in the cycle to apply real positional pressure on established veterans. During his initial 18 months, Pochettino capped 62 different players, demonstrating a willingness to survey the wider pool. However, giving experimental caps in domestic friendlies is vastly different from forging a battle-tested core capable of competing in high-stakes continental qualifiers and major tournaments.

    3.3.2 Dogma vs Pragmatism: The Dual-National Mandate

    This necessary roster renewal is complicated by Pochettino’s ideological stance on recruiting dual-national players. Historically, the USMNT’s competitive ceiling has been artificially elevated by securing elite dual-national talent developed in European academy systems—players like Folarin Balogun, Yunus Musah, Sergiño Dest, and Antonee Robinson.

    Herculez Gomez delivered a sharp warning regarding Pochettino’s operational philosophy in this domain. According to Gomez, Pochettino adopted an almost zero-tolerance stance toward dual-national recruitment during his first term, demanding unhesitating, unconditional commitment to the United States before offering national team call-ups, while refusing to engage in persistent personal recruitment battles.

    "Under Mauricio Pochettino, he almost took a zero tolerance when it came to dual nationals, the recruitment of dual nationals. I don't think the U.S. Men's National Team has that luxury."
    — Herculez Gomez, ESPN Futbol Americas

    Gomez argued that American soccer simply does not possess the structural depth of talent seen in France, Brazil, or England. The USMNT cannot afford the moral luxury of turn-down diplomacy. If top-tier dual-national prospects in Europe feel alienated by a dogmatic "take it or leave it" posture, they will choose rival federations, stripping the US player pool of high-end technical quality. Balancing Pochettino’s demand for ideological purity against the pragmatic reality of global talent acquisition represents one of the most volatile friction points of his upcoming tenure.

    3.4 The 2030 Exit Plan: Wandering Eyes and European Flirtation

    While US Soccer executives celebrate securing Pochettino’s signature through 2030, the Futbol Americas panel painted a starkly different picture of the contract’s reality: a high-priced illusion of security that provides maximum protection for the manager and zero safety for the federation.

    3.4.1 The European Magnet and Managerial Opportunism

    Ale Moreno offered a brutally candid assessment of Pochettino’s personal ambitions, asserting that the Argentine coach views the USMNT job not as a destination project, but as a prestigious, highly lucrative holding pattern. In elite European coaching circles, managing an international team outside of Western Europe is frequently utilized as a strategic retreat—a way to maintain global visibility, collect a marquee salary, and wait for high-profile vacancies to open at top-tier European clubs.

    "Definitely, 100%. No way he's going to be in the World Cup in 2030. He's going to jump ship... Mauricio Pochettino has got to stop flirting with everybody else outside of US Soccer. Every time a big job comes open, his name cannot be part of the conversation."
    — Ale Moreno, ESPN Futbol Americas

    Throughout his initial 18-month stay, Pochettino’s name was repeatedly linked by international media to open positions in the Premier League, La Liga, and Serie A. Rather than swiftly squelching these rumors, Pochettino often responded with vague, coy diplomatic statements that left the door open to prospective suitors. Moreno stressed that a manager leading a national federation into a long-term rebuild cannot continuously flirt with external clubs. It undermines managerial authority, creates squad instability, and signals to the players that the head coach himself is eyeing the exit ramp.

    3.4.2 The Clause Fallacy and Moral Hazard

    Jeff Carlisle added a vital perspective, warning that if Pochettino fails to complete the full four-year contract, the structural damage to the USMNT program will be severe. The federation has invested massive financial capital and reshaped its entire organizational chart around his persona. If Pochettino resigns two years into the cycle to take over a European powerhouse, US Soccer will be left without a Sporting Director, without a coherent technical framework, and without a high-caliber replacement ready to step in.

    Conversely, if results deteriorate and US Soccer is forced to terminate the agreement prematurely, the federation faces an exorbitant contract buyout that will drain capital away from grassroots development and domestic infrastructure. This dynamic represents a classic moral hazard: Pochettino holds all the upside—career flexibility, institutional control, and financial security—while US Soccer absorbs 100% of the operational and strategic risk.

    3.5 Beyond the National Team: MLS Governance, Messi's Echo Chamber, and Domestic Realities

    The broader broadcast context of this Futbol Americas episode situated the Pochettino contract debate within a rapidly changing domestic landscape, highlighted by two major developments in American club soccer: the executive leadership transition at Major League Soccer and the ongoing commercial footprint of Lionel Messi.

    3.5.1 The Larry Berg Era and MLS's Commercial Ambitions

    The announcement of Larry Berg taking over as the new Commissioner of Major League Soccer, succeeding Don Garber after his historic multi-decade tenure, signals a pivotal structural shift for the domestic game. Berg enters executive power at a time when the relationship between MLS and US Soccer is undergoing intense renegotiation. For Pochettino’s national team pipeline to flourish, MLS must evolve beyond its traditional identity as a commercial marketing engine and become a genuine producer of elite, high-intensity domestic talent.

    The panel touched upon the implicit friction between MLS squad mechanics—such as salary caps, Designated Player limits, and roster construction rules—and the technical requirements of the national team. If Berg’s administration prioritizes commercial spectacles over expanding youth academy investment and facilitating early European transfers for top domestic prospects, Pochettino’s player pool will suffer. The alignment between Larry Berg’s commercial vision for MLS and Pochettino’s technical standards for national team selection will be a defining macro trend of the next four years.

    3.5.2 Lionel Messi, Leagues Cup, and the Distraction Economy

    Simultaneously, the episode covered Lionel Messi’s triumphant return from injury, scoring a brace in Leagues Cup action to power Inter Miami forward. While Messi’s presence continues to generate unprecedented global viewership, ticket revenue, and media engagement for North American soccer, analysts on the show implicitly highlighted the contrast between commercial vanity and sporting substance.

    The "Messi Effect" has created a thriving distraction economy—an environment where spectacular individual performances in regional cup competitions dominate news cycles, often obscuring systemic deficiencies within domestic player development and national team governance. As Messi continues to illuminate American stadiums, the cold reality remains that the USMNT cannot rely on foreign superstars to elevate its national standing. The domestic game must build authentic, self-sustaining technical quality—a goal that requires rigorous structural work rather than reliance on marquee exhibition tournaments.

    4. Speaker Perspectives & Analytical Contrast

    The dynamic tension on this episode of Futbol Americas was driven by the sharp ideological contrasts among the four principal voices. Each panelist represented a distinct analytical lens, reflecting the broader fractures within the North American soccer media landscape.

  • Ale Moreno
  • Former International Striker / Lead ESPN Analyst
  • Institutional Cynic & Performance Realist
  • US Soccer is acting out of desperation; Pochettino is a 100% flight risk who will jump ship before 2030.
  • Jeff Carlisle
  • Senior ESPN Investigative Journalist
  • Structural Insider & Organizational Analyst
  • Pochettino's extension fills the technical void left by Crocker's exit, but failing to stay all four years will catastrophically damage US Soccer.
  • Herculez Gomez
  • Former USMNT Forward / Co-Host
  • Pragmatic Populist & Player Pool Advocate
  • Pochettino's "zero-tolerance" dual-national policy is an unaffordable luxury for a nation lacking deep talent reserves.
  • Mauricio Pedroza
  • Lead Anchor / Moderator
  • Diplomatic Skeptic & Accountability Champion
  • Pochettino was brought in to win marquee knockout matches; failing to beat higher-ranked teams invalidates vague claims of "culture change."
    • Speaker Primary Role / Perspective Core Analytical Stance Key Argument / Critical Citation

    Ale Moreno delivered the most aggressive and unvarnished critique of the broadcast. Operating as the institutional skeptic, Moreno refused to accept corporate PR narratives regarding "continuity" and "culture." His focus remained fixed on empirical output (31 games without an elite scalp) and power dynamics (US Soccer begging Pochettino to stay). Moreno’s cynicism is grounded in international experience; he understands that elite coaches prioritize personal career trajectories over federation loyalty, and he views US Soccer’s preemptive contract extension as amateurish governance.

    Jeff Carlisle provided the essential investigative context that grounded the debate in institutional reality. Rather than focusing solely on emotion, Carlisle illuminated the administrative mechanics—specifically the departure of Matt Crocker and JT Batson’s decision to adopt a flat organizational structure. Carlisle highlighted the terrifying vulnerability of US Soccer’s strategy: by putting all their technical eggs in Pochettino’s basket, the federation has created a high-wire act where any sudden managerial departure would trigger complete organizational paralysis.

    Herculez Gomez bridged the gap between executive politics and dressing-room dynamics. Focus-locked on roster construction, Gomez identified Pochettino’s ideological blind spots, specifically his rigid posture toward dual-national recruitment. Having played inside international setups, Gomez understands that talent acquisition in North America requires relentless salesmanship and flexibility. His critique exposed the danger of applying European managerial arrogance to an American talent pool that still relies heavily on foreign-developed assets.

    Mauricio Pedroza maintained structured journalistic pressure throughout the broadcast, ensuring that vague generalizations like "building process" were subjected to hard performance metrics. Pedroza repeatedly brought the conversation back to the central benchmark: did Pochettino deliver a team that was "substantially better" than the 2022 squad? By forcing the panel to confront the reality of the Round of 16 exit against Belgium, Pedroza prevented the discourse from dissolving into uncritical optimism.

    5. Strategic & Industry Implications

    The analytical debate captured on Futbol Americas holds profound strategic implications that extend far beyond the immediate fate of the USMNT, offering a case study in international sports governance, coach contract mechanics, and talent pipeline economics.

    First, US Soccer’s experiment with a "managerial monarchy"—dissolving the Sporting Director role to centralize authority under a superstar head coach—runs directly counter to global best practices established by elite federations like Germany (DFB), France (FFF), and England (The FA). Modern sports science and talent identification demand specialized, dedicated leadership unburdened by weekly tactical preparation. By abandoning this division of labor, US Soccer has set a concerning precedent: prioritizing short-term managerial prestige over institutional continuity. If this model fails, it will serve as a stark warning to other mid-tier international federations considering similar administrative surrenders to marquee managerial figures.

    Second, the financial economics of Pochettino’s extension illustrate the systemic inflation within international coaching markets. Non-European federations seeking top-tier European managers are forced to pay massive premiums while accepting contractual asymmetry—granting low buyout clauses or flexible departure terms to entice coaches away from European club football. This structural imbalance creates severe financial risk. Federations risk diverting capital away from domestic academy infrastructure, grassroots coaching education, and women's game development simply to service the astronomical salaries of celebrity coaches who may depart at the first sign of a European offer.

    Third, the conflict surrounding dual-national recruitment highlights the shifting geopolitics of global football talent. As FIFA eligibility rules become increasingly flexible, national federations operate in a hyper-competitive recruitment marketplace. Pochettino’s dogmatic demand for unhesitating national allegiance reflects an outdated 20th-century national team ethos. In the modern era of globalized scouting, federations that fail to aggressively pitch, court, and accommodate multi-national athletes will lose critical talent to rivals who treat player recruitment with the sophisticated salesmanship of elite European club transfers.

    6. Looking Ahead: Unresolved Questions & Next Milestones

    As Mauricio Pochettino officially embarks on this historic four-year contract extension leading toward the 2030 World Cup, US Soccer enters an uncharted operational phase. The rhetoric of "fresh starts" and "building culture" must now give way to concrete, measurable milestones. Football analysts, media observers, and federation stakeholders must track five decisive metrics over the next 12 to 24 months to evaluate whether this monumental gamble will pay dividends or destabilize the program:

    • Metric 1: Roster Turnover and Youth Integration Rate
      Pochettino must demonstrate a concrete willingness to phase out aging veterans from the 2022/2026 cycles and integrate U21/U23 talent into competitive starter roles. The percentage of total match minutes awarded to players under the age of 23 during international windows will serve as the definitive benchmark of roster renewal.
    • Metric 2: Signature Victories Against FIFA Top-15 Opposition
      The zero-win stat line against higher-ranked opponents must be erased. Scheduled friendlies and Nations League fixtures against top-tier South American and European nations must yield tangible results. Continued failure to defeat top-15 teams will confirm that the USMNT under Pochettino remains trapped beneath a persistent glass ceiling.
    • Metric 3: Dual-National Conversion Success Rate
      Observers must closely monitor how Pochettino handles high-profile dual-national prospects currently progressing through European academies. Will his rigid, "zero-tolerance" policy alienate top-tier prospects, or will he adapt his managerial approach to secure elite talent for the US player pool?
    • Metric 4: Structural Integration of Youth Pathways
      With no Sporting Director in place, how effectively will Pochettino oversee the U20 national team and Olympic squad preparation? Key milestones include technical alignment across youth camps, consistent tactical profiling across age groups, and seamless player movement from youth national teams into senior squad call-ups.
    • Metric 5: European Managerial Speculation and Retention Metrics
      The true test of Pochettino's commitment will occur during the European club coaching carousel cycles (summer and mid-season managerial dismissals). Public handling of European coaching rumors by Pochettino and his agency will reveal whether he views US Soccer as a long-term build or an interim holding station.

    The four-year contract extension granted to Mauricio Pochettino represents an audacious, high-risk bet by US Soccer leadership. By flattening its executive hierarchy, centralizing technical power, and committing vast financial resources, the federation has bet its entire future on a single individual. Whether this decision catalyzes a historic breakthrough at the 2030 World Cup or precipitates a devastating structural collapse remains the single most compelling storyline in American sports journalism.

    💬 Key Quotes & Speaker Breakdown

    USMNT manager contract

    "We agree on a deal for the next cycle of four years. The goal is to prepare the World Cup in the best condition... I think now it's a fresh start."

    — Mauricio Pochettino

    Mauricio Pochettino's future

    "Definitely, 100%. No way he's going to be in the World Cup in 2030. He's going to jump ship."

    — Ale Moreno

    USMNT management

    "It concerns me watching from the outside that I get the sense that the United States soccer federation seemed to need Mauricio Pochettino a whole lot more than Mauricio Pochettino needs the US soccer federation."

    — Ale Moreno

    Mauricio Pochettino's commitment

    "Mauricio Pochettino has got to stop flirting with everybody else outside of US soccer. Every time a big job comes open, his name cannot be part of the conversation."

    — Ale Moreno

    USMNT strategy

    "Pochettino has to stay all four years for this to work. If he doesn't, I think it's going to be hugely damaging to the US men's national team program."

    — Jeff Carlisle

    USMNT recruitment

    "Under Mauricio Pochettino, he almost took a zero tolerance when it came to dual nationals, the recruitment of dual nationals. I don't think the U.S. Men's National team has that luxury."

    — Herculez Gomez

    USMNT performance

    "31 games unable to beat a team ranked higher than the US men's national team. That's sometimes how we measure process."

    — Ale Moreno

    USMNT roster overhaul

    "He's got to bring in the next crop of young players. Part of the reason why Mauricio Pochettino got hired is because the US men's national team had become stale."

    — Jeff Carlisle
    📜 View Full Episode Verbatim Transcript 42,210 characters
    Early morning on a Manhattan sidewalk, a shooting caught on surveillance video. It was an assassination style killing, and everybody saw it. A new podcast series from ABC Audio in 2020 goes inside this captivating case. I'm ABC News legal analyst Brian Buckmeyer. Listen to burden of proof Luigi Mangioni, wherever you get your podcasts. Richard Pochettino has put pen to paper on a new contract with the US men's national team here. We in charge until 2030. We agree and you deal for the next cycle of four years. The head coach of the UNN national team. He was a tournament darling, an American sweetheart. He was very charming. He made the US men's national team play in a way they've not played. Probably in the World Cup history. The best takeaway was to feel that we are close. And we reduce the gap with the big national teams. And I think that is the most important is from there to keep building that idea. If the 17, 12 and 2 record isn't enough to make you think twice, there is the ever flirting Maricio Pochettino with European football factor here. Well, you think he's going to jump ship? Definitely, 100%. No way he's going to be in the World Cup in 2030. It's the best thing in the team, every single national team, that when you start a process after a World Cup and you have four years. Well, I don't know whether he's Henry's agent that got this deal, but they're laughing all the way to whatever they want to go. If we can guarantee that Pochettino's going to be here for 2030, this is good. But not guaranteeing that, not thinking he would be swayed, that's not good enough. You're prioritizing the financial over the sporting. And I fear this could set the US men's national team back. Oh, it's been a while, but we are back. Football America's live with Ale Moreno. Hey, Gomez, I am Mauricio Pedroza. It's good to be back after a short break after the World Cup. It's purely just a short break. You guys ready to go? Pump up, fire it up. We'll take it from here now. Why are you just so weak already, sir? Why are you so up first? Is it your first day, Ale? No, it is not my first day now. Feels like the first day. All right. League Scope is underway. That means Lionel Messi is back doing his thing. And also Major League Soccer has a new commissioner. We'll discuss, but we've got to start with Mauricio Patrino. He is also back. He will be back as a manager of the US men's national team. His new contract runs through the 2030 World Cup. Potch has managed 31 games winning 17 with the US. Let the team to the round of 16 during the World Cup losing against Belgium in Seattle. All right, let's take a listen to Mauricio Patrino, what he had to say after renewing his deal with the US men's national team. One of the things is the potential that we fell after two or 18 months. Not only the players that were working with us, if not the potential from the new player that you cannot, the potential of the young kid and the people. And I think also the connection that we saw and I think we created during the World Cup between the team and the fans that were amazing. What we don't want is to create the continuity. I think the goal in the last process was 18 months working in only one goal that was in the World Cup. It's to prepare the World Cup in the best condition with things that after to be involved, you cannot change mindset, structure, things that were very, was an easy to manage and I think now it's a more fresh start. I think we need to start with a new approach in all different areas, also from us in between us. But I think with a clear goal, of course, with the objective is always in the World Cup. When we arrived in the past, it was too many things that were already built or things that you cannot change because it's the risk not to arrive on time. It was a moment that difficult to destroy things and to try to make in a different way things. Too plenty of things in different areas that were difficult to have an impact or to build in a different way. I think now it's a fresh start. All right, we now welcome ESPN, senior writer Jeff Carlisle, welcome Jeff to the show. What's the main reason why US Soccer decided to bring back Mauricio Pochettino is what? Well, I think they want to see a continuation of the accountability that Pochettino brought to the program, the continuation of the style that they showed, at least in the group stage of the World Cup. And you have to remember, there's no longer a sporting director. Matt Crocker is gone to hear US Soccer CEO JT Bassam describe it. He's not going to be replaced. It's going to be a flatter, less hierarchical structure on the sporting side. Yes, you've got a Gucci on Yewoo, you've got Dan Hilfrich. But they need additional people with soccer expertise and let's face it, everyone in the organization, Mauricio Pochettino has the most. And so I think you're going to see him contributing to the player pathway and how that gets executed. You're going to see him work a little bit more and have or keep a closer eye on some of the youth national teams starting with the U20s and as well as the Olympic team into your time. So I think those are the big reasons that said Pochettino has to stay all four years for this to work. If he doesn't, I think it's going to be hugely damaging to the US men's national team program. And it would really be a huge setback if he didn't stick around. We're going to get into that obviously because that's why I try to emphasize. His new contract runs through the end of the 2030 World Cup. That is clearly a big discussion point. But I want to go back to what Jeff said, continuity being one of the main, if not the main reasons why Pochett is back, is that the right reason, continuity. That's a big reason. It should be a correct reason if you believe he's going to stay and we're going to get into that. This isn't something that J.T. Batson, Cindy Parleco and the powers that be a US soccer said, this is what we saw at the World Cup. Let's continue this. This offer per reports and Jeff could clarify. This was already on the table before the World Cup started. So before you saw the finished product, before you knew anything about what it was going to look like at the World Cup, while you knew everything that had gone on previously before the World Cup, you were willing to continue with Marisa Pochettino because you felt he was the right person to lead you. And now, not only are you allowing that to continue, but you're saying, we want to give you more power. We want to give you the ability to mold US soccer in a player pathway, player development, in coaching reform and helping us out with the coaching. You want to give him more power in a, I believe, critical time in this generation's history, where currently there are 15 players that played in this World Cup. That next World Cup will be into their 30s. You've got to usher in a new generation. You have to make sure that person who is doing this, there's all this power you just gave him to, who is doing this with these new players will be there at the end to see this thing through. So in that line of thought, if that's what they were going for, then it's the correct thing. If you think he will be there. If you think you give him the control, you allow him to do these things with the new generation, then that's a continuity that they were looking for. That's what they want to build on. I just don't know if that's the case. What specifically is it continuation that Mauricio is going to bring to this thing with his new contract, Ali? I cannot believe that you're asking that question. I thought by now you would know culture, the culture, the ongoing culture change that has happened. I knew that, but I still have to ask the question. It's a culture. It's all about the culture. You know what worries me? And look, as you guys know, I have zero affiliation with the US soccer federation, nor the US national team. But it concerns me watching from the outside that I get the sense that the United States soccer federation seemed to need Mauricio Pogetino a whole lot more than Mauricio Pogetino needs, the US soccer federation. It's a desperate plea for you stay and be part of the decision-making process and make sure that you are now involved with the US national teams as well, and that path forward and how we create this new path into the national team. We need all your input. We need all your expertise that Jeff was talking about. At some point, you have to be a soccer federation and behave like a soccer federation. And look at Mauricio Pogetino in equal terms. Not begging him to stay. Not, hey, can you do us a favor? This is not a favor. He's getting paid to do this job and getting paid really well. And so the evaluation process also needs to be a part of this. And so if this offer was on the table before the World Cup, that is a non-starter for me. If indeed that's the case. You have to consider a very basic question based on the World Cup performance. Is this team substantially better than what they were in 2022? And for me, no, you can argue one way or another. For me, better, maybe. Substantially better, no. Did they meet the expectations of this World Cup? Well, I guess so. But ahead of the World Cup, the conversations that we were having, why would make a great World Cup? And I said it time and time again on this show, quarter final. Did they make it to the quarter final? No, they did not. And so now it's a conversational, well, it's good, not great. Which could have been the same conversation we had in 22. Good, not great. He was brought in to win the sort of game that got you into the quarter final. And that did not happen. So is this team substantially better? No. So this whole culture thing, I guess, into the future. It will improve magically somehow, because apparently the players will improve magically somehow. And by the time we get to 2030, then this is a team that should be contending for the quarter final and beyond. I just don't see it, just like I don't see the growth of this national team from the perspective of being substantially better than what they were in 2022. 31 games unable to beat a team ranked higher than the US men's national team. That's sometimes how we measure process. Now, Jeff, I'm going to ask you this question and I'm going to ask the guys the same question. Everything is not perfect. Some things have to change. There must be improvement in some areas. Give me the one area. Give me the one element that Mauricio Puchotino really has to focus. Where does the change need to happen first in his new term? He's got to bring in the next crop of young players. Part of the reason why Mauricio Puchotino got hired is because the US men's national team had become stale. You could almost pick the lineup without even thinking, especially around the time of Copa America. And so he brought in some accountability. But the only way that's going to continue is if he really tries. As he said, start from zero and rebuild this team. He's got to bring in young players earlier in the cycle. Now granted, 62 different players got caps under Mauricio Puchotino. So you could say that he plumbed the depths of the player pool. But he's got four years now instead of 18 months. And so I think he needs to use that time wisely and really try to dig into the players that are up and coming. Like a gozo who's now going to be a crystal palace probably. Bring in players like that and really try to see what they can do and really put some pressure on some of the existing players, some of the veterans in the pool. Like you mentioned, a lot of these guys are going to be over 30 Christian, Policic, Tyler Adams, Western McKenny. Those guys need to be put under pressure from a younger generation of players that's coming up. It can't be a situation where these players are just kind of happy to be called up. I mean, they really need to be aiming for 20 or I'm sorry, 2030. And being a force, being a real impact player on that particular team and not just be content with being on the squad. I put pressure on the incumbents. All right. New set of players, fresh players, where else would you like to see change on their pochatino? Well, under Moneci pochatino, he almost took a zero tolerance when it came to dual nationals, the recruitment of dual nationals. I don't think the U.S. Miss National has that luxury. In this previous cycle, there were the Nathaniel Browns, excuse me. He ended up starting a game for Germany, starting multiple games for Germany as a left back. There are players, dual nationals, which you really got a hone in on and you got to convince them to play for the U.S. Miss National. It's a very romantic feeling of you don't need to convince they they should want to die for the jersey. But the world is changing. This last World Cup, there were over 90 French players playing in the World Cup. Only 26 of them played for the French national team. It's the world we live in today. You've got a much more proactive in that front. But Jeff is right. It's ushering the next generation. 15 of the players next World Cup that played in this World Cup will be 30 or over. You've got to start getting players, the Mamedis, the Julian Halls, the Xavier Gossos, the YoCoachins, the new generation, gradually into this. It can't be a situation like 2018, where you threw the baby out with the bath water. You said, this is your team and it's Lord of the Flies with these kids. It's got to be ushered in the right way. What do you want to see change and are you confident that we will see those changes? What Jeff said, what Hurt said, what you're about to say. Okay. Hurt just mentioned that we're romantic. Marisa Puchetino has got to stop flirting with everybody else outside of you at soccer. Help with romantic. He has to stop flirting with everything and everybody. And every time a big job comes open, his name cannot be part of the conversation. Because if you want me to believe that we're changing a culture, then get yourself immersed in the culture. Get yourself part of this process, long term, not for now. If you want me to believe that, indeed, this is something that we're thinking in the long term, then you have to be in the long term. It can be that every time that you go and talk in Spain or you're talking in Argentina, you have this podcast, so that podcast over there, you're talking about possibilities of spurs and here and there and everywhere. No, no, no. Talk to me about the U20s. Talk to me about the Olympic thing. Talk to me about the young players. Talk to me about the competition within the team. Talk to me about the growth of individual players and how that translates into success for the national team. Talk to me about that. Don't talk to me about everything else that has nothing to do with U.S. soccer. Again, I want to see romanticism for U.S. soccer, not for everybody else. I hear Ali and honestly don't see one thing that you like about Puchetino as the manager. Not one thing. Can you name one thing that you're like, well, you know, if he does this, then I might change my mind. I would say, Mauricio, that I have no feelings for Puchetino one way or another. You have some sort of feelings and not positive feelings. You do have feelings for Puchetino. You ask me a question and it is my job in this year. They're not lovable feelings. There's some kind of feelings. Okay. Have anything of what I've said has been inaccurate or... No, no, no. Has it been over the top? All of these things that I've discussed are things that are... No. What has been over the top? No, I mean, not everything is over the top. I just feel like not everything is that negative with Puchetino. What has been negative? If I just may briefly... No, no, no. But I want him to answer the question. What has been negative of what I have said? I feel like you don't believe he has any kind of grip on what the team needs. That's what I get from what you say. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe it's just me misinterpreting what you say. No, I... Maybe it's me. Maybe it's me. All the accusations that come in from here, from there to here. I've made no accusations whatsoever. I see. I just ask the question. I see. That's in police sharing what I understood from what you said. That's fine. But it's fine. We don't have to agree on it. We don't have to agree on it. I don't know what we're disagreeing on. That's a thing. That's a different point of view. I don't know why. But I don't know what we're disagreeing on. No, and it goes to what is happening right here. There seems to be a massive divide by people. Yeah. On Marisa Pochettino. And many people feel you are speaking ill of Pochettino, or hating on Marisa Pochettino when you bring up things that happen. You know, I tweeted his record. That's not an opinion. That was the record. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. It's a fact. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.